Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) comparison of 5-FU and capecitabine (cape) with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) for neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer: Results of NSABP R-04.

Authors

null

Greg Yothers

NSABP Biostatistical Center and University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA

Greg Yothers , Patricia A. Ganz , Samia H. Lopa , Clifford Y. Ko , D. Lawrence Wickerham , Norman Wolmark

Organizations

NSABP Biostatistical Center and University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, University of California, Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, NSABP and the NSABP Biostatistical Center, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, University of California, Los Angeles Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Los Angeles, CA, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project and Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Preliminary results of NSABP R-04 indicated that 5-FU and cape have similar pathologic complete response (pCR) outcomes and that the addition of oxaliplatin did not improve pCR. We present PROs comparing 5-FU and cape treatments on quality of life (QoL), convenience of care (CoC), and symptoms. Methods: Clinical stage II or III rectal cancer patients were randomized to receive 5-FU (225mg/m2 5 days/wk) or cape (825 mg/m2 5 days/wk) along with RT (4,500cGy in 25 fractions over 5 wk + boost of 540-1080cGy in 3-6 daily fractions). About half of these patients were also randomized to receive oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2 /wk). QoL was assessed by the functional assessment of cancer therapy–colorectal (FACT-C) trial outcome index (TOI) and symptoms were assessed by the fluoropyrimidine specific symptom checklist (SCL) collected at baseline, after chemoradiation before surgery (post therapy), and at 1 year. CoC was assessed by the modified ECOG CoC scale post therapy. Primary hypotheses were to compare 5-FU and cape on the endpoints of change in TOI and SCL baseline to post therapy and CoC at post therapy. P-values, means, and confidence intervals (CI) are adjusted for clinical stage, sex, and intent for sphincter-saving surgery. Results: 625 5-FU and 650 cape patients completed baseline and post therapy data forms. Patient characteristics were similar by treatment. Change in TOI was similar by treatment post therapy (p = .21). Change in SCL post therapy was greater for cape patients than for 5-FU patients (mean difference 1.02, 95% CI 0-2.04, p = .05). CoC was superior with cape compared to 5-FU post therapy (mean difference 3.07, 95% CI 1.31-6.01, p = .002). The change from baseline to post therapy for all FACT-C subscales was similar by treatment. Change in TOI, SCL, and all FACT-C subscales were similar by treatment at the 1-year assessment. Conclusions: PROs indicate that patients treated with 5-FU and cape have similar QoL. Cape provides significantly greater convenience of care but slightly increased symptoms compared to 5-FU. NCI PHS grants U10CA37377, U10CA69974, U10CA12027, and U10CA69651, support from sanofi-aventis and Hoffmann La-Roche.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2012 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session C: Cancers of the Colon and Rectum

Track

Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Sub Track

Prevention, Diagnosis, and Screening

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00058474

Citation

J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl 4; abstr 391)

DOI

10.1200/jco.2012.30.4_suppl.391

Abstract #

391

Poster Bd #

A10

Abstract Disclosures