Breast cancer (BC) care and outcomes in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC).

Authors

null

N. Justo

Optum Insight, Stockholm, Sweden

N. Justo , N. E. Wilking , B. Jönsson

Organizations

Optum Insight, Stockholm, Sweden, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background:Theglobal BC Care and Outcomes Report revealed ample differences in BC care and outcomes exist across continents, exposing the need for regionally focused studies. Aim: Provide an overview of the burden of BC and of BC care and outcomes in LAC and identify the major challenges Methods: Review of literature (PubMed, LILACS, SCIELO), public databases (Globocan 2002 and 2008, CEPALSTAT, DIRAC, PAHO, WHOSYS, etc) and conference presentations (ASCO, ISPOR). Local experts and patient organizations were surveyed. Current BC epidemiology in LAC, countries’ risk profiles and future trends, disease burden and available resources, patterns of care and treatment access (case studies), and outcomes (such as mortality-to-incidence ratios - MIRs) were analyzed and compared (Sweden as benchmark). Results: BC exhibits the highest annual incidence (114,900 cases) and mortality (37,000 deaths) of all cancers in LAC and is expected to double by 2030. Age is the main risk factor. Heavy burden is due to younger age at diagnosis. Poor outcomes are partly due to late diagnosis. Availability of specialized surgeons, waiting times, node clearance policy and access to breast reconstruction vary widely across countries and between public and private settings. Radiotherapy equipment is insufficient, except in Uruguay, Chile, and Venezuela. All modern systemic therapies are available, but some not widely diffused due to their costs. Palliative care is developing but, despite great efforts, problems persist. BC MIRs have improved, albeit unevenly, over time. Conclusions: Inequalities in access to diagnosis and treatment, fragmented organization and management of BC care and poor uptake of evidence-based best practices result in high morbidity and associated societal costs.


Incidence ASR 2008 Mortality ASR 2008 Mean age at diagnosis DALYs lost per BC case Stage
% I + II
MIR 2008 MIR 2002 Change %

Arg 74 20 60 3.4 0.27 0.29 -8
Brz 42 12 56 6.5 63 0.29 0.31 -5
Chi 40 11 58 3.3 70 0.27 0.30 -8
Col 31 10 57 4.7 61 0.32 0.41 -22
CoRi 43 12 58 3.5 0.28 0.44 -35
Ec 31 10 5 4.5 0.33 0.41 -21
Mex 27 10 53 5.4 62 0.37 0.40 -7
Pan 29 12 57 5.8 0.40 0.41 -4
Peru 34 11 54 6.2 51 0.32 0.40 -20
Uru 91 24 61 3.3 82 0.27 0.29 -8
Vz 43 14 55 4.5 0.32 0.39 -17
Swd 79.4 14 63 2.4 92 0.19 0.20 -5




WHO projection for LAC # of deaths (000) DALYs lost (000)

2008 37   Δ 99% 613   Δ 38%
2030 73,5    849   

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 Breast Cancer Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session C

Track

Prevention, Survivorship & Health Policy

Sub Track

Health Services Research

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29, 2011 (suppl 27; abstr 202)

Abstract #

202

Poster Bd #

C16

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

The effect of advances in management of uterine-serous-carcinoma on population mortality.

First Author: Aifen Wang

Abstract

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Cancer in Southeast Asia: A comparative analysis of 2022 incidence and mortality data.

First Author: Edward Christopher Christopher Dee