EXPERT-C: A randomized, phase II European multicenter trial of neoadjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin chemotherapy (CAPOX) and chemoradiation (CRT) with or without cetuximab followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) in patients with MRI-defined, high-risk rectal cancer.

Authors

null

A. Dewdney

The Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, United Kingdom

A. Dewdney , J. Capdevila , B. Glimelius , A. Cervantes , D. M. Tait , G. Brown , A. Wotherspoon , D. Gonzalez de Castro , Y. J. Chua , R. Wong , Y. Barbachano , J. R. Oates , I. Chau , D. Cunningham

Organizations

The Royal Marsden Hospital, Surrey, United Kingdom, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain, Akademiska University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia, Royal Marsden Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London and Surrey, United Kingdom, The Royal Marsden Hospital, London and Surrey, United Kingdom, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: This trial evaluates the addition of C to our previously described treatment strategy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before CRT and TME in patients with MRI selected high-risk operable rectal adenocarcinoma (Chua et al 2010). Methods: Eligible patients were randomised to 4 cycles of CAPOX followed by CRT (with concurrent capecitabine), TME and 4 cycles of adjuvant CAPOX (CAPOX) or the same regimen with weekly C (CAPOX + C). The primary endpoint was complete response (pCR or radiological CR in those not having surgery) in the KRAS + BRAF wild type (wt) population. Secondary endpoints included radiological response (RR), PFS, OS, safety and QoL. Molecular analysis was performed for PIK3CA, PTEN loss, EGFR and NRAS. Results: Between 2005-2008, 164 patients were recruited from 15 centres. Molecular analysis was performed on 149 patients, 90 (60%) had KRAS + BRAF wt tumours (CAPOX n=44, CAPOX +C n=46). In 15 patients, insufficient tissue was available for analysis, 8 of whom achieved a pCR. In the wt population the RR was significantly improved with the addition of C to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (50% vs 70% p=0.038) and CRT (72% vs 89% p=0.028). There was no significant difference in CR (9% vs 11%) or pCR (7% vs 11%). PFS curves separated at 1 and 2 years in favour of C but 3 year PFS was 81% vs 80% HR 0.81 p=0.668. There was a significant improvement in 3 year OS with the addition of C (81% vs 96%; HR 0.27, p=0.035). In the all treated population there was no difference in any of the endpoints. Skin toxicity was increased with C during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and CRT and diarrhoea was increased during CRT. Conclusions: The addition of cetuximab in wt patients significantly improved RR and OS. The low pCR rate may be explained by the 8 patients with a pCR but insufficient tissue for molecular analysis, 6 of whom received cetuximab. The high overall survival demonstrated in both arms, in this selected poor risk group supports further evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer. The molecular analysis of PIK3CA, PTEN loss, EGFR and NRAS will be presented at the meeting.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

2004-004707-38

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 3513)

Abstract #

3513

Poster Bd #

2

Abstract Disclosures