A phase II study of neoadjuvant docetaxel (D) plus bevacizumab (B) in patients (pts) with high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors

William Oh

W. K. Oh

Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY

W. K. Oh , M. D. Galsky , M. Barry , F. Fennessey , J. P. Richie , J. H. Hayes , R. S. Bhatt , M. Taplin , P. G. Febbo , R. W. Ross

Organizations

Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, University of California, San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Treatment options for high-risk localized prostate cancer remain inadequate, with most pts relapsing despite local therapy. We conducted a phase II multicenter trial of neoadjuvant D +B prior to radical prostatectomy in pts with high-risk localized prostate cancer. Methods: Eligibility included any of the following: PSA >20 ng/mL or PSA velocity >2 ng/mL/yr, cT3 disease, any biopsy Gleason 8-10, Gleason 7 with T3 disease by endorectal (er) MRI. In addition, pts with ≥50% biopsy cores involved and either Gleason 7 or PSA >10 or cT2 disease were eligible. Pts were treated with D 70 mg/m2 q3 weeks x 6 cycles and B 15 mg/m2 q3 weeks x 5 cycles. The primary end point was erMRI partial response (PR, defined as ≥50% decrease in tumor volume) in a single target lesion after chemotherapy. Results: 42 pts were enrolled, and 41 were treated. Median age was 55 yrs (range, 40-66 yrs). Baseline characteristics included: median PSA 10.1 ng/mL (range, 2.1-72.4 ng/mL), cT2 49%, cT3 32%, and Gleason 8-10 73%. Thirty-eight of 41 (93%) pts completed all 6 cycles. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events included hyperglycemia (1/41), allergic reaction (1/41), cough, lymphopenia (3/41), and febrile neutropenia (3/41). Thirty-seven of the 41 pts underwent radical prostatectomy. Reasons for not proceeding with surgery included: a bladder neck injury, positive lymph nodes, and withdrawal of consent in 2 pts. Response data are shown in the Table. No pts achieved a complete pathologic response. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant D+B demonstrates clinical activity in men with high-risk localized prostate cancer. The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in prostate cancer, and perioperative antiangiogenic therapy in solid tumors in general, requires further elucidation through ongoing and planned randomized trials.


Response assessments.
Outcome measure Number (%)

erMRI partial response 12/41 (29%)
Any PSA decline 31/41 (76%)
> 50% PSA decline 9/41 (22%)
Pathologic downstaging 14/41 (34%)
Pathologic node positive 8/41 (20%)
Positive margins 14/41 (34%)
Extracapsular extension 23/41 (56%)
Seminal vesicle involvement 12/41 (29%)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00321646

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 4642)

Abstract #

4642

Poster Bd #

10B

Abstract Disclosures