Everolimus plus octreotide LAR versus placebo plus octreotide LAR in patients (pts) with advanced neuroendocrine tumors: Multivariate analysis of progression-free survival from the RADIANT-2 trial.

Authors

null

Philippe Ruszniewski

University of Paris VII and Beaujon Hospital

Philippe Ruszniewski , Paola Tomassetti , Stephen Saletan , Ashok Panneerselvam , James Yao

Organizations

University of Paris VII and Beaujon Hospital, University of Bologna, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis Oncology Biometrics and Data Management, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: In the phase III RADIANT-2 trial, everolimus, an oral inhibitor of mTOR, plus octreotide (E+O) demonstrated a clinically meaningful increase in median progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo + octreotide LAR (P+O) in pts with advanced low- or intermediate-grade NET and a history of secretory symptoms associated with carcinoid syndrome (ESMO 2010 Abstract #LBA8). In order to determine the factors that significantly influence PFS, a multivariate analysis was performed. Methods: Pts with advanced NET were randomized to oral everolimus 10 mg/d + octreotide LAR 30 mg IM q 28 days (n=216) or P+O (n=213). The primary endpoint was PFS per adjudicated central review (RECIST v1.0). Multivariate analysis using a Cox-proportional hazards model was performed. Significant factors (p<0.05) were determined after a stepwise elimination of the nonsignificant factors from the model. Results: Multivariate analysis indicated that significant prognostic factors for PFS were treatment (everolimus vs placebo) (p=0.001), WHO performance status (p=0.007), lung as primary site (p=0.044), baseline CgA (p<0.001), and bone involvement (p=0.022) (Table). Conclusions: Multivariate analysis of the RADIANT-2 trial has allowed, for the first time, evaluation of the prognostic risk factors associated with PFS in a large phase III, placebo-controlled trial in pts with advanced NET. A better understanding of these risk factors can help clinicians in the treatment of their pts.


Multivariate analysis of PFS.

N Median PFS
  (95% CI)
Hazard ratio
  (95% CI)
P

Treatment 0.62 (0.47, 0.82) 0.001
E+O 216 16.43 (13.67, 21.19)
P+O 213 11.3 (8.44, 14.59)
WHO performance
  status
0.69 (0.52, 0.90) 0.007
0 257 16.62 (13.63, 20.27)
≥1 170 11.10 (8.31, 14.23)
Lung as primary site 1.55 (1.01, 2.36) 0.044
Yes 44 10.61 (5.55, 14.23)
No 385 14.23 (11.96, 17.68)
Baseline CgA 2.11 (1.53, 2.91) <0.001
Elevated 282 11.33 (9.66, 13.80)
Nonelevated 138 26.84 (17.68, NA)
Bone involvement 1.52 (1.06, 2.18) 0.022
Yes 59 8.31 (5.32, 13.83)
No 367 15.38 (13.04, 19.19)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only

Track

Tumor Biology

Sub Track

Prognostic Factors

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00412061

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr e21084)

Abstract #

e21084

Abstract Disclosures