Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
D. Adkins , J. Ley , B. Nussenbaum , J. Diaz , R. Paniello , W. L. Thorstad , H. A. Gay , J. Subramanian , T. M. Wildes , J. Mathai , T. Rachocki , D. I. Kuperman
Background: Achievement of a complete (CR) or partial (PR) response at the PTS to IC with cisplatin and 5-FU correlates with disease control after subsequent definitive radiation-based therapy (RT) in patients with HNSCC. The likelihood of CR/PR after IC is high in T1/2 and low in T3/4 tumors. SPARC, an albumin binding protein that is commonly overexpressed in HNSCC, may facilitate preferential accumulation of nab-paclitaxel at PTS compared to other formulations of taxanes. Methods: The primary objective of the prospective phase II trial was to determine the clinical CR and PR rate at the PTS to an IC regimen of weekly nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2) and cetuximab (250 mg/m2) with every 3 week cisplatin (75 mg/m2) and 5-FU (750 mg/m2 per day x3 CIVI) (ACCF) given for two cycles in patients with HNSCC. PTS response assessment was performed by clinical exam using categorical outcomes [CR: 100%↓, near CR: 95%↓, PR: 50-94%↓, or progression]. All patients were treated with a third cycle of ACCF, then definitive chemo-RT. These outcomes were compared to retrospective data from a cohort of 58 patients treated with TPF+C. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled on the prospective trial and all were evaluable for the primary objective. Most (73%) had bulky T3/4 primary tumors. PTS response to ACCF is shown in the table: CR/near CR: 16 patients (53%) and PR: 14 patients (47%). In the retrospective analysis, most (83%) had bulky primary tumors. The PTS response to TPF+C was CR: 15 patients (27%), PR: 31 patients (56%), and progression: 9 patients (16%). Conclusions: ACCF is a novel IC regimen that resulted in a high likelihood of a favorable (CR/PR) PTS response in patients with high T stage HNSCC. These outcomes compare favorably to our historical experience with TPF+C.
Outcome |
Prospective ACCF (n=30) | Retrospective TPF+C * (n=58) |
---|---|---|
Primary site OP L HP OC |
22 7 0 1 |
37 13 6 2 |
T stage 1 2 3 4 |
0 8 11 11 |
1 9 20 28 |
PTS response CR Near CR PR Progression Not evaluable |
13 3 14 0 0 |
15 0 31 9 3 |
* PTS assessment by exam and/or imaging.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2019 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Felix Keil
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Cailing Jiang
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Svetlana Kutukova
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Kiyoto Shiga