Clinical response rate at primary tumor site (PTS) following a novel induction chemotherapy (IC) regimen of weekly nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab-)paclitaxel and cetuximab with every-3-week cisplatin and 5-FU (ACCF) versus docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU, and cetuximab (TPF + C) in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Authors

null

D. Adkins

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

D. Adkins , J. Ley , B. Nussenbaum , J. Diaz , R. Paniello , W. L. Thorstad , H. A. Gay , J. Subramanian , T. M. Wildes , J. Mathai , T. Rachocki , D. I. Kuperman

Organizations

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Achievement of a complete (CR) or partial (PR) response at the PTS to IC with cisplatin and 5-FU correlates with disease control after subsequent definitive radiation-based therapy (RT) in patients with HNSCC. The likelihood of CR/PR after IC is high in T1/2 and low in T3/4 tumors. SPARC, an albumin binding protein that is commonly overexpressed in HNSCC, may facilitate preferential accumulation of nab-paclitaxel at PTS compared to other formulations of taxanes. Methods: The primary objective of the prospective phase II trial was to determine the clinical CR and PR rate at the PTS to an IC regimen of weekly nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m2) and cetuximab (250 mg/m2) with every 3 week cisplatin (75 mg/m2) and 5-FU (750 mg/m2 per day x3 CIVI) (ACCF) given for two cycles in patients with HNSCC. PTS response assessment was performed by clinical exam using categorical outcomes [CR: 100%↓, near CR: 95%↓, PR: 50-94%↓, or progression]. All patients were treated with a third cycle of ACCF, then definitive chemo-RT. These outcomes were compared to retrospective data from a cohort of 58 patients treated with TPF+C. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled on the prospective trial and all were evaluable for the primary objective. Most (73%) had bulky T3/4 primary tumors. PTS response to ACCF is shown in the table: CR/near CR: 16 patients (53%) and PR: 14 patients (47%). In the retrospective analysis, most (83%) had bulky primary tumors. The PTS response to TPF+C was CR: 15 patients (27%), PR: 31 patients (56%), and progression: 9 patients (16%). Conclusions: ACCF is a novel IC regimen that resulted in a high likelihood of a favorable (CR/PR) PTS response in patients with high T stage HNSCC. These outcomes compare favorably to our historical experience with TPF+C.


Outcome

Prospective ACCF (n=30) Retrospective TPF+C * (n=58)

Primary site
  OP
  L
  HP
  OC

22
7
0
1

37
13
6
2
T stage
  1
  2
  3
  4

0
8
11
11

1
9
20
28
PTS response
  CR
  Near CR
  PR
  Progression
  Not evaluable

13
3
14
0
0

15
0
31
9
3

* PTS assessment by exam and/or imaging.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Head and Neck Cancer

Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Sub Track

Head and Neck Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00736944

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 5560)

Abstract #

5560

Poster Bd #

14G

Abstract Disclosures