Survival outcomes in elderly patients with plasma cell myeloma: The three-decade Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) experience.

Authors

null

E. L. Campagnaro

University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH

E. L. Campagnaro , S. J. Jacobus , H. Uno , M. M. Oken , R. A. Kyle , S. V. Rajkumar , P. R. Greipp , D. H. Vesole , M. Weiss , R. Fonseca , H. M. Lazarus

Organizations

University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ, Marshfield Clinic Minocqua Center, Minocqua, WI, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Successful treatment of plasma cell myeloma (PCM) includes cytotoxic chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors. Landmark papers by Kumar et al and Brenner et al in 2008, and Turesson et al in 2010, showed significant gains in median overall survival (OS) of PCM patients but these gains were attributed primarily to age < 65 years. Marginal improvement seen in older patients did not reach significance. We examined outcome for patients treated on frontline ECOG protocols over the past 33 yrs to assess whether there has been survival improvement in elderly patients. Methods: We reviewed 4 phase III study data for previously untreated PCM patients. ASCT regimens were excluded. OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and group differences were tested using 2-tailed log-rank test. Cohorts were identified based on date of accrual to clinical trial: A 1988-1993, B 1994-2000, and C 2001-2006. Results: 1,528 patients were treated (Table). 727 (48%) were > 65 yr. 358 pts (23%) were age 70-79 yr and 48 pts (3%) were > 80 yr. For all pts, 5 yr probability of OS was significantly better in cohort C (51%) as compared to cohorts A (31%) and B (29%), respectively (p<0.0001). For pts > 65 yr, this effect on OS still was seen but substantially diminished (39% on C versus 26% on A and B, p=0.012), while in the younger cohort effect is more pronounced (63% on C, 35% on A and 32% on B). Conclusions: OS in elderly PCM pts has improved but OS gains still lag behind younger PCM pts. Increased comorbidity, treatment-related toxicity, physician/patient biases, and differences in disease biology in elderly patients are all possible contributing factors to worse outcomes. In-depth review of these variables may contribute to improved design of future clinical trials for elderly PCM pts.


Accrual period Pts <65 yr
Pts ≥65 yr
No. Median OS (0.95 CI) [yr] No. Median OS (0.95 CI) [yr]

A 1988-1993 371 3.7 (3.4, 4.1) 282 3.3 (2.9, 3.9)
B 1994-2000 100 3.5 (2.9, 4.1) 93 3.0 (2.6, 3.8)
C 2001-2006 330 7.4 (6.2, NA)* 352 3.7 (3.3, 4.9)**

* Comparing C to A+B, p≤.001 ** Comparing C to A+B, p=.012

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Lymphoma and Plasma Cell Disorders

Track

Hematologic Malignancies—Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Sub Track

Multiple Myeloma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 8021)

Abstract #

8021

Poster Bd #

7

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Filip Ionescu

First Author: Chakra Pani Chaulagain

First Author: Olumide B. Gbolahan

First Author: Andrew Trunk