A phase II study of sorafenib in patients with metastatic or unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors with failure of both imatinib and sunitinib: A KGSG study.

Authors

null

M. Ryu

Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

M. Ryu , S. H. Park , B. Ryoo , S. Im , H. Kwon , S. S. Lee , S. R. Park , B. W. Kang , Y. Kang

Organizations

Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea, Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, South Korea, Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, South Korea, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea, Department of Oncology/Hematology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea

Research Funding

Other

Background: This prospective, multicenter, phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients (pts) with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) who failed previous standard tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Methods: Thirty-one patients with pathologically proven metastatic or unresectable GISTs who failed both imatinib and sunitinib were accrued between Dec 2009 and Jun 2010. Sorafenib was administered orally at 400 mg twice daily. Results: Among 31 pts, 23 (74%) were male. The median age was 59 years (range, 31-78). All had metastatic disease in the liver (n=27), peritoneum (n=19), lung (n=4), or bone (n=1). Ten pts (32%) received nilotinib as a third line treatment after the failure of imatinib and sunitinib. The primary sites were stomach (n=10) and small bowel (n=21). With sorafenib, 3 pts (10%) achieved a partial response and 17 pts (55%) had stable disease. With a median follow-up of 7.5 months (range, 5.0-12.6), the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 months (95% CI, 1.6-8.2) and the disease control rate was 37.6% at 6 months. Pts with prior use of 3rd line nilotinib and primary genotypes other than mutations at KIT exon 11 showed significantly worse PFS (p=0.0085 and p=0.0341, respectively). Median OS has not been reached yet. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events of sorafenib with frequency > 5% of pts included hand-foot skin reaction (16%), fatigue (7%), hypertension (7%), and abdominal pain (7%). Those toxicities were manageable with dose modification (n=10), and there was no treatment-related death. The relative dose intensity during the first 6 cycles was generally over 80%. Conclusions: Sorafenib was effective as a salvage treatment with manageable toxicities in GIST pts who failed prior standard TKIs. With sorafenib, about one third of pts can maintain disease stabilization for more than 6 months. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of our results.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Sarcoma

Track

Sarcoma

Sub Track

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GIST)

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01091207

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 10010)

Abstract #

10010

Poster Bd #

2

Abstract Disclosures