Everolimus in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET): Impact of somatostatin analog use on progression-free survival in the RADIANT-3 trial.

Authors

Manisha Shah

Manisha Shah

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center

Manisha Shah , Catherine Lombard-Bohas , Tetsuhide Ito , Edward Wolin , Eric Van Cutsem , Carolin Sachs , Robert Winkler , Jeremie Lincy , Timothy Hobday , James Yao

Organizations

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hopital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Kyushu University, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Mayo Clinic, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: In the phase III RADIANT-3 trial, everolimus, an oral mTOR inhibitor, demonstrated superiority in progression-free survival (PFS) with a median of 11.0 versus 4.6 mo for placebo (HR=0.35; 95% CI, 0.27-0.45; P<0.0001) in patients with advanced pNET (ESMO 2010, Abstract LBA9). Here we present an exploratory analysis of the impact of long-acting somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy in this trial. Methods: Patients with progressive advanced low- or intermediate-grade pNET were randomized to everolimus 10 mg/d orally (n=207) or placebo (n=203); both arms received best supportive care. Long-acting SSAs were permitted before entry and as best supportive care during the study. The primary endpoint was PFS (RECIST v1.0). Patients who received SSA therapy before and during the study in each treatment arm were identified. Results: Overall, 203 (50%) patients received SSA therapy before study entry, and 163 (40%) received SSA therapy during the study. Of those patients with prior SSA therapy, 145 (71%) also received SSA therapy during the trial. Treatment arms were well balanced with respect to prior SSA treatment (50%, everolimus arm; 50%, placebo arm) and on-study SSA treatment (39%, everolimus arm; 40%, placebo arm). An improvement in median PFS was observed with everolimus compared with placebo in patients who had any SSA (11.4 mo vs 3.9 mo; HR=0.40; 95% CI, 0.29-0.56) and in those without any SSA (10.8 vs 4.6; HR=0.35; 95% CI, 0.24-0.50). The PFS benefit with everolimus was observed across all patients subgroups regardless of SSA use (Table). Conclusions: Everolimus significantly prolonged PFS compared with placebo in patients with advanced pNET in this large phase III clinical trial. This benefit was seen across all patient subgroups, including patients receiving prior and on-study SSA treatment.


Hazard ratio (95% CI)
Everolimus vs. placebo

All patients 0.35 (0.27-0.45)
Without concomitant SSA 0.34 (0.25-0.46)
With concomitant SSA 0.43 (0.29-0.64)
Without prior SSA 0.36 (0.25-0.51)
With prior SSA 0.40 (0.28-0.56)
Without prior and concomitant SSA 0.34 (0.25-0.47)
With prior and concomitant SSA 0.43 (0.28-0.66)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Noncolorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Other GI Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00510068

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 4010)

Abstract #

4010

Poster Bd #

3

Abstract Disclosures