Influence of KRAS and BRAF mutational status and rash on disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with resected stage III colon cancer receiving cetuximab (Cmab): Results from NCCTG N0147.

Authors

null

S. R. Alberts

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

S. R. Alberts , S. N. Thibodeau , D. J. Sargent , M. R. Mahoney , F. Sinicrope , A. F. Shields , E. Chan , R. M. Goldberg , S. Gill , M. S. Kahlenberg , J. T. Quesenberry , T. C. Smyrk , A. Grothey , S. G. Nair

Organizations

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project; Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, St. Luke's Regional Medical Center, Sioux City, IA, Lehigh Valley Hospital, Allentown, PA

Research Funding

NIH

Background: Mutation (mut) of KRAS and BRAF negatively influence response to Cmab in metastatic colorectal cancer with the possible exception of KRAS Gly13Asp (JAMA 304:1812). Incidence of rash has served as a biomarker of a positive response to Cmab. N0147 assessed FOLFOX alone (arm A) or with Cmab (arm D) in resected stage III colon cancer. Impact of KRAS and BRAF mut status, and rash, on 3 yr DFS was assessed individually and jointly. Methods: Tissue from patients (pts) enrolled in N0147 was evaluated for mut in KRAS using the DxS mutation test kit KR-03/04 assessing for 7 different potential mut in codons 12 and 13. The V600E BRAF mut was assessed using an automated sequence technique. CTCAE v3.0 was used to classify and grade skin rash. Results: 2,580 pts were evaluable for KRAS analysis; 2516 for BRAF. See table for DFS based on KRAS and BRAF status. Pts with wtKRAS and wtBRAF had a DFS of 76% and 72% in arms A and D, respectively. 9% of pts treated with Cmab had Gr 3+ rash, with a nonsignificant trend toward increased DFS with rash in wtKRAS and wtBRAF groups (3 yr DFS in pts with rash 76% versus no rash 69%, p=0.26). Conclusions: Pts with wtKRAS and wtBRAF did not benefit from Cmab added to FOLFOX. None of the different KRAS mut predicted improved DFS with Cmab. DFS for pts with mutBRAF was similar to that for mutKRAS. Gr3+ rash was associated with some trend toward improved DFS with Cmab. Supported by NIH Grant CA25224, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ImClone, Sanofi-Aventis, and Pfizer.


Group Arm (N) 3-yr DFS (%) HR (95% CI) P value

KRAS
 WT A (909)
D (954)
75
72
1.2 (0.9-1.4) 0.19
 Gly13Asp Mut A (88)
D (78)
67
56
1.4 (0.8-2.4) 0.19
 Gly12Asp Mut A (139)
D (130)
70
69
1.1 (0.7-1.7) 0.74
 Gly12Val Mut A (77)
D (79)
64
69
0.9 (0.5-1.6) 0.64
 Other mutations A (70)
D (56)
66
60
1.3 (0.7-2.3) 0.38
BRAF
 WT A (1093)
D (1076)
72
70
1.2 (1-1.4) 0.08
 V600E Mut A (155)
D (192)
67
69
1.1 (0.8-1.7) 0.56
Both KRAS/BRAF
 WT A (736)
D (743)
76
72
1.2 (1-1.6) 0.11

Abbreviations: WT, wild-type; Mut, Mutation; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00079274

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 3607)

Abstract #

3607

Poster Bd #

18G

Abstract Disclosures