A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross over trial of the effect on quality of life (QOL) of continuing dexamethasone beyond 24 hours following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.

Authors

null

J. L. Vardy

Sydney Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia

J. L. Vardy , G. R. Pond , A. Dodd , D. Warr , B. Seruga , M. J. Clemons , L. Bordeleau , I. Tannock

Organizations

Sydney Cancer Centre, Sydney, Australia, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, ON, Canada, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, ON, Canada, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Research Funding

Other

Background: Dexamethasone (D) improves acute nausea and vomiting when given pre chemotherapy (CTh), and continued D improves emesis after highly emetogenic CTh. There is lack of consensus about the optimal antiemetic regimen for delayed control after moderately emetogenic CTh. Many patients complain of symptoms while on D that may impact on QOL. Methods: A randomized double-blind cross-over trial compared D versus placebo (P) for delayed emesis in CTh-naïve women with breast cancer treated with moderately emetogenic CTh. All patients received IV granisetron and IV D pre-CTh and oral granisetron on day 2. Patients were randomized to oral D (4mg bid) or P for 48 hours, and changed to the alternative treatment for cycle 2. Primary endpoints were: (i) patient preference; (ii) difference between cycles in change in QOL (EORTC-QLQ-C30) from day 1 to 8. Secondary endpoints were emesis (Functional Living Index-Emesis; patient diaries) and the Dexamethasone Symptom Questionnaire. Results: Mean age of the 94 women recruited was 51yrs (range 27-76); 15 received AC and 79 FEC CTh. Thirteen women withdrew pre-cycle 2 with no difference in rates or reasons for withdrawal between arms. Thirty-one women preferred P and 37 preferred D (54% of those with a stated preference; 95% CI: 42-67%); 12 stated no preference. Of those preferring D, 54% rated it ‘much better’, compared with 39% for P. Patients had increased symptoms and decreased QOL from D1 to D8 in both cycles. There was greater decrease in global QOL (p=.06) and greater increase in pain (p=.04) when patients received D. No other symptom/QOL domains were significantly different. A non-significant decrease in vomiting intensity and delay in onset of vomiting was observed when receiving D, with no difference in nausea. Conclusions: No difference was found in patient preference, QOL or symptoms regardless of whether D or P was used for delayed emesis after moderately emetogenic CTh. We suggest continued D be omitted from initial antiemetic regimens for moderately emetogenic CTh, and offered selectively to patients with poor initial control of delayed nausea and vomiting.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Patient and Survivor Care

Track

Patient and Survivor Care

Sub Track

Supportive Care

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00152867

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 9020)

Abstract #

9020

Poster Bd #

4

Abstract Disclosures