Evaluation of panitumumab (pmab) plus fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) after first-line bevacizumab (bev) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): A subgroup analysis of study 181.

Authors

null

M. Peeters

Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium

M. Peeters , T. J. Price , A. H. Strickland , T. E. Ciuleanu , W. Scheithauer , S. O'Reilly , M. M. Keane , D. R. Spigel , Y. Tian , K. Krishnan

Organizations

Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, Australia, Monash Medical Centre, East Bentleigh, Australia, Institut Oncologic, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, Department of Medical Oncology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland, West of Ireland Cancer Center, Galway, Ireland, Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Pmab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR, has demonstrated activity in combination with FOLFIRI for second-line treatment of mCRC (study 181). Here, we describe the results of a prespecified subgroup analysis of study 181 to evaluate the efficacy of pmab plus FOLFIRI vs FOLFIRI alone in pts who received prior bev. Methods: Prior bev use for mCRC (yes vs no) was a predefined baseline covariate and stratification factor in study 181. A subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the treatment effect of pmab plus chemotherapy on progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and tumor response rate in pts with wild-type (WT) KRAS tumors who received prior bev for mCRC. Results: 115 pts (from 20 countries) with WT KRAS tumors who had received prior bev were identified. Worst grade of 3 or 4 adverse events (AE) occurred in 73% of pts in the pmab+FOLFIRI arm vs 57% in FOLFIRI arm. Worst grade 3-4 AEs of interest included: skin toxicity (tox [35 vs 5%]); eye tox (7 vs 0%); nail tox (5 vs 0%); diarrhea (9 vs 8%); stomatitis/oral mucositis (7 vs 2%); pulmonary tox (0 vs 3% [and one grade 5 in the FOLFIRI arm]); vascular tox (2 vs 15%); hypomagnesemia (4 vs 0%); cardiac tox (0 vs 3%); and hypocalcemia (2 vs 0%). Grade 5 AEs occurred in 2% and 3% of pts, respectively. Median PFS and OS were numerically longer, and there was a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) in the pmab+FOLFIRI arm vs FOLFIRI (Table). Conclusions: Pts with mCRC and WT KRAS tumors who progress after therapy with bev may benefit from second-line therapy with pmab+FOLFIRI.


Pmab+FOLFIRI FOLFIRI Measure of risk

N 55 60
Median PFS,
  months (95%CI)
5.8
(5.2-6.7)
3.7
(3.5-5.3)
HR=0.712
(0.447-1.133)
Median OS,
  months (95%CI)
15.7
(12.6-23.8)
12.5
(9.2-16.1)
HR=0.680
(0.432-1.069)
N* 53 57
ORR, n (% [95%CI]) 16
(30.19 [18.34-44.34])
1
(1.75 [0.04-9.39])
OR=24.22
(3.40-1033.11)

* Pts who had measureable lesion per central radiology review were included in the analysis of ORR. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT00339183

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 3574^)

Abstract #

3574^

Poster Bd #

14F

Abstract Disclosures