Phase III trial comparing long-term versus short-term androgen deprivation combined with high-dose radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: GICOR protocol DART01/05.

Authors

null

A. Zapatero

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain

A. Zapatero , A. Guerrero , X. Maldonado , A. Alvarez , C. González San Segundo , A. Cabeza , V. Macías , F. Casas , A. Pedro-Olivé , S. Villa , A. Boladeras , M. L. Vazquez de La Torre , C. Martin de Vidales , F. A. Calvo

Organizations

Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain, Hospital Son Dureta, Palma de Mallorca, Spain, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, Hospital General de Catalunya-Hospital Universitario Salamanca, Barcelona, Spain, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain, Clínica Plató, Barcelona, Spain, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Germans Trias, Barcelona, Spain, Institut Catala d'Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain, Hospital Do Meixoeiro, Vigo, Spain, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain

Research Funding

Other

Background: Hormone therapy plus radiotherapy significantly decreases recurrences and mortality of patients affected by locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa). Controversy remains about the optimal duration of androgen deprivation (AD) when associated to high-dose radiotherapy (HDRT). This trial was designed to determine whether long-term AD (LTAD) is superior to short-term AD (STAD) in the setting of HDRT Methods: Eligibility included patients with cT1c-T3aN0M0 adenocarcinoma of prostate with intermediate and high risk factors according to NCCN criteria and PSA less than 100 ng/ml. All patients received 4 months of neoadjuvant and concomitant AD (STAD) + HDRT (minimum dose to the prostate 76 Gy) before randomization to adjuvant gosereline (LTAD) for two years. Stratification was performed according to risk group (intermediate risk [IR] versus high risk [HR]). Study endpoints included overall survival (OS), metastasis free survival (MFS), disease free survival (DFS) and biochemical-disease free survival (bDFS). Initial analysis of results is reported. Results: A total of 361 men were registered, of whom 180 were randomly assigned to STAD (97 HR and 83 IR) and 181 to LTAD (94 HR and 87 IR). Median isocenter radiation dose to the prostate was 78.0 Gy for both groups. Elective pelvic radiotherapy was administered in 28 patients treated with STAD and in 20 patients with LTAD. Demographic data, tumour and treatment characteristics were evenly distributed in the two arms. After a median follow-up of 30 months, 9 patients in the STAD group (2 intermediate risk and 7 high risk PCa) and none in the LTAD group had biochemical failure according to Phoenix definition (p=0.002). The median time to biochemical relapse was 28 months. Four patients developed distant metastasis (all of them in the STAD arm) and 3 patients have died from causes other than PCa. Grade ≥ 2 radiation related adverse effects in both arms were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Although preliminary, the results of the present study suggest that LTAD could be superior to STAD in patients with unfavourable PCa treated with HDRT.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer

Track

Genitourinary Cancer

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

2005-000417-36

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl; abstr 4580)

Abstract #

4580

Poster Bd #

2C

Abstract Disclosures