Background: CTCs have an established role in the prognosis of metastatic prostate cancer. Little data exists regarding the role of CTCs in BR of prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a correlation between the number of CTCs in men with BR with varying prostate specific antigen (PSA) and PSA doubling time (PSADT) categories. Secondary endpoints looking at correlation of the CTCs with clinical or laboratory factors (Gleason scores, testosterone, hemoglobin, alkaline phosphatase, BMI, imaging results) will also be assessed. Methods: BR was defined as patients (pts) who have undergone primary treatment with prostatectomy or radiation or both, with rise to >/= 0.2 from a prior undetectable level for prior prostatectomy or > 2 mg/dl rise from post-nadir radiotherapy. The study was powered to detect a Pearson correlation of .46 with a sample size of 36. Eleven of planned accrual goal of 36 pts were enrolled from May to September 2010. PSADT was obtained and correlated with the CTC values, categorized as PSADT of < 3 months, 3-14.9 months and > 15 months. CTCs were evaluated in 7.5 mL of peripheral blood using the CTC CellSearch test. Results: The median age for 11 patients was 75 y/o (range: 57-91) with a median PSA of 1.6 ng/mL (range 0.2-6.5) and testosterone levels of 309 ng/dL (range: 31-471). Gleason scores were 8 (n=1), 7 (n=5), 6 (n=2), 5 (n=3). Prostatectomy was the primary treatment in 6 pts, radiotherapy in 5 pts and Cyberknife in 1 pt. Median hemoglobin was 12.43 g/dL, BMI was 26.79 and alkaline phosphatase was 69 IU/L. PSADT varied between 3 to 55 months. All pts accrued had 0 CTC levels. The latter result translates into a 95% confidence interval upper bound of approximately .27 for the proportion of patients in this population who have non-zero CTC levels. Conclusions: Prostate cancer pts with BR have negative blood CTCs and does not appear to correlate with PSA or PSADT. However, the limited number of patients precludes sufficient interpretation at this time and further accrual is ongoing. The absence of CTC levels in this patient population, if supported through further data collection, could emerge as an important unanticipated finding from this study. Supported by IRG-08-091-01 from ACS to GWU Cancer Institute.