Surveillance for stage I testicular seminoma at a single institution in Japan: Retrospective analysis of prognostic factors for relapse.

Authors

null

Ken-Ichi Kakimoto

Department of Urology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases

Organizations

Department of Urology, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Treatment options for clinical stage I seminoma include adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) as well as surveillance and adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Data available from the surveillance, adjuvant RT and adjuvant CT series suggest that all treatment strategies achieve a complete cure in almost 100% of the patients with stage I testicular seminoma. The success of surveillance of patients with stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors and the establishment of curative CT for advanced disease have led to re-examination of the standard treatment approach. We report the results of a retrospective analysis of the prognostic factors for stage I testicular seminoma. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the survey of 87 patients with stage I testicular seminoma who were admitted in an institution between January 1982 and January 2009. We examined if the following tumor characteristics could possibly predict the relapse: age at diagnosis, tumor size, pathological T (pT) stage, elevation of beta-hCG level and/or LDH level, invasion of the rete testis, vascular invasion and lymphatic invasion. The cause-specific survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: During a median follow-up of 8.1 years (range, 1.2-25.7 years), 13 (14.9%) relapses were observed, with an actuarial 5-year relapse-free rate (RFR) of 87.9%. The univariate analysis showed that the following characteristics were not predictive of relapse: age at diagnosis (RFR: 89% [<36 years] vs. 88% [≥36 years]), tumor size (RFR: 90% [<5.6 cm(median)] vs. 85% [≥5.6 cm]), pT stage (RFR: 91% [pT = 1] vs. 84% [pT = 2 and pT = 3]), elevation of beta-hCG level (RFR: 89% [normal] vs. 87% [elevated]), invasion of the rete testis (RFR:90% [absent] vs. 80% [present]), vascular invasion (RFR:86% [absent] vs. 87% [present]), and lymphatic invasion (RFR: 88% [absent] vs. 87% [present]). The overall 5-year survival rate was 97%. Conclusions: Prognostic factors for relapse could not be identified in this retrospective analysis of the patients admitted in a single institution. To identify the prognostic factors for risk-adapted treatment for stage I testicular seminoma, we need to study a large sample population in Japan.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session C: Penile, Urethral, Bladder and Testicular Cancers

Track

Testicular Cancer,Urothelial Carcinoma,Penile/Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Testicular Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl 7; abstr 234)

Abstract #

234

Poster Bd #

A36

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Robert A Huddart

First Author: Thomas Wagner

Abstract

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Association of DAZL expression with risk of recurrence in clinical stage 1 testicular germ cell tumors.

First Author: Alok Tewari