Review of completed and ongoing trials of capecitabine-based adjuvant therapy in patients with early-stage colon cancer.

Authors

James Cassidy

James Cassidy

University of Glasgow/Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre

James Cassidy , Eduardo Diaz-Rubio

Organizations

University of Glasgow/Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Hospital Clinico San Carlos

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Capecitabine is an established alternative to 5-FU in gastrointestinal cancers. In metastatic colorectal cancer, capecitabine is non-inferior to 5-FU and capecitabine + oxaliplatin (XELOX) is non-inferior to FOLFOX4. Capecitabine is also an effective adjuvant treatment for early-stage colon cancer. Here we review the evidence available from completed studies of adjuvant capecitabine and describe ongoing trials in this setting. Methods: The X-ACT trial included 1,987 patients (pts) with resected stage III disease receiving either capecitabine (n=1,004) or bolus 5-FU/LV (n=983). NO16968 included 1,886 pts with resected stage III disease receiving either XELOX (n=944) or 5-FU/LV (n=942). The primary efficacy endpoint of both trials was DFS. Other large phase III trials of capecitabine in high-risk stage II/stage III pts include AVANT (XELOX + bevacizumab vs. FOLFOX4 ± bevacizumab), QUASAR2 (capecitabine vs. capecitabine + bevacizumab), SCOT (capecitabine or 5-FU/LV + oxaliplatin 12w vs. 24w), and a Japanese study of single-agent capecitabine. Results: In X- ACT, capecitabine was at least equivalent to 5-FU/LV in terms of DFS (HR=0.88; 95% CI, 0.77-1.01) and OS (HR=0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-1.01). In a preplanned multivariate analysis, capecitabine led to significantly superior DFS (p=0.02) and OS (p=0.02) vs. bolus 5-FU/LV [Twelves et al. WCGIC 2010]. In NO16968, DFS was significantly superior for XELOX vs. 5-FU/LV (HR=0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93; p=0.0045) [Haller et al. ECCO-ESMO 2009]. There was a trend towards improvement in OS with XELOX (HR=0.87; 95% CI, 0.72-1.05; p=0.1486); follow-up is ongoing. Capecitabine-based therapy had an acceptable safety profile in both trials [Twelves et al. NEJM 2005; Schmoll et al. JCO 2007]. Data have yet to be reported from the AVANT, QUASAR2, SCOT and Japanese trials, although results from these trials in over 15,000 pts are awaited with interest. Conclusions: Adjuvant capecitabine is non-inferior to 5-FU/LV when given as monotherapy and superior to 5-FU/LV when given in combination with oxaliplatin. Capecitabine should be considered as a standard component of adjuvant treatment regimens for pts with stage III disease.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2011 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

General Poster Session C

Track

Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Sub Track

Multidisciplinary Treatment

Citation

J Clin Oncol 29: 2011 (suppl 4; abstr 495)

Abstract #

495

Poster Bd #

A140

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Jerod J Sears

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Implementation of 3 month therapy for stage III colon cancer in a large community practice.

First Author: Victoria Shklar