Safety and efficacy of osimertinib in patients with NSCLC and uncommon tumoral EGFR mutations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors

null

Jonathan N. Priantti

Federal University of Amazonas - UFAM, Manaus, Brazil

Jonathan N. Priantti , Maysa Vilbert , Francisco Cezar A Moraes , Isabella Michelon , Caio Castro , Natasha B. Leighl , Ludimila Cavalcante , Yu Fujiwara , Alfredo Addeo , Jair Bar , Alessio Cortellini , Amin Nassar , Abdul Rafeh Naqash

Organizations

Federal University of Amazonas - UFAM, Manaus, Brazil, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, Federal University of Pará - UFPA, Belém, Pará, Brazil, Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, Department of Hematology/Oncology, University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, Department of Oncology, University Hospital HUG, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel, Division of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, OK

Research Funding

No funding sources reported
None.

8642

Background: Osimertinib is broadly used for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. However, the activity of osimertinib is not fully characterized in tumors harboring uncommon EGFR mutations, which represents about 10% of EGFR-mutated NSCLC cases. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of osimertinib in patients with NSCLC and uncommon tumoral EGFR mutations. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. Uncommon EGFR mutations were defined as any mutation other than the exon 19 deletion, L858R and T790M mutations, and exon 20 insertion, except when in compound. Efficacy was assessed by objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Heterogeneity was examined with I2 statistics and random-effect model was used for a meta-analysis. Results: Nine studies comprising 331 patients were included. Median follow-up ranged from 12.6 to 22.0 months (mos). Median age in each study ranged from 51 to 72 years old (table). Overall, 62% (205/331) of patients were female and 77% (256/331) of patients had an ECOG PS 1. About 78% (258/331) of patients received Osimertinib in a 1st line setting. Uncommon tumoral EGFR mutations included G719X in 40% (131/331) of patients, L861X in 27% (91/331), and S768I in 15% (49/331). Pooled analysis showed an overall ORR of 49.5% (95% CI, 42.2 – 56.9), a DCR of 90.2% (95% CI, 86.2 – 94.3), a median OS of 24.5 mos (95% CI, 11.9 – 24.5), a median PFS of 9.5 mos (95% CI, 8.2 – 11.0), and a median DOR of 17.4 mos (95% CI, 7.9 – 22.7). Intracranial (i) efficacy had an iORR of 50.3% (95% CI, 30.3 – 70.3), an iDCR of 92.8% (95% CI, 76.2 – 100), and a median iPFS of 6.1 mos (95% CI, 4.5 – 6.6). In a subgroup analysis according to EGFR mutation, overall ORR was significantly different in patients with tumoral G719X, S768I and L861 mutations (ORRs of 28.8%, 33.3%, and 67.7%, respectively, p for subgroup differences < 0.01). Overall, osimertinib was well tolerated with a frequency of all-grade AEs of 86.2% (95% CI, 61.2 – 100) and ≥ G3 of 18.0% (95% CI, 1.2 – 34.7). Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that patients with NSCLC with uncommon tumoral EGFR mutations may benefit from osimertinib treatment. Patients harboring tumoral L861 mutation achieved a significantly higher ORR compared to the modest ORR in G719X, S768I cases.

Characteristics of included studies.

Study IDNAge, yG719XL861XS768ICNS metastasis
Okuma et al., 202340722081010
Villaruz et al., 2023177010725
Cho et al., 2020366019989
Bar et al., 202360641812320
Ji et al., 2023436514192NA
Eide et al., 202221691310612
Pizzutilu et al., 2022656819151119
Breadner et al., 202336701497NA
Zheng et al., 20206514103

N: number.

Median. y: year. CNS: central nervous system. NA: not available.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Lung Cancer—Non-Small Cell Metastatic

Track

Lung Cancer

Sub Track

Metastatic Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 16; abstr 8642)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.8642

Abstract #

8642

Poster Bd #

506

Abstract Disclosures