St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Masa Lasica , Sikander Ailawadhi , Chengcheng Fu , Sheeba K. Thomas , Depei Wu , Shuhua Yi , Tanya Siddiqi , Qingsong Yin , John N. Allan , Wenming Chen , Jeffrey V Matous , Ru Feng , Zi Chen , Min Yu , Mingyu Li , Zicong He , Mohammad Ahmad , Hengbang Wang , Asher Alban Akmal Chanan-Khan , Yifan Zhai
Background: Lisaftoclax is a novel, oral, highly selective, potent BCL-2 inhibitor in development. In an ibrutinib-resistant patient-derived WM xenograft/preclinical model, lisaftoclax + ibrutinib has a strong synergistic effect. This report provides updated efficacy and safety data of lisaftoclax-based therapies (including combinations with ibrutinib) in pts with WM. Methods: In this global, open-label, phase 1b/2 multicenter study, pts with WM were enrolled in 3 arms: Arm A (lisaftoclax) included BTKi-resistant/intolerant pts; Arm B (lisaftoclax + ibrutinib), treatment-naïve pts; and Arm C (lisaftoclax + rituximab), BTKi-naïve relapsed/refractory pts. Lisaftoclax was escalated from 400 to 1,200 mg using a modified toxicity probability interval design. A 3-day ramp-up was used for pts at high risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS). Objectives were efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK) assessments (responses assessed per IWWM criteria). Results: As of January 25, 2024, 46 pts were enrolled and treated at doses of up to 1,000 (Arm A), 1,200 (Arm B), and 800 mg (Arm C; Table). The median (range) treatment duration was 11 (1-28; Arm A), 23.5 (1-34; B), and 11.5 (5-33; C) months. Objective response rates (PR, VGFR, CR) were: 41.7% (Arm A), 90.9% (B), and 37.5% (C). In Arm A, pts with wild-type CXCR4 (n = 7) had better overall response to lisaftoclax than the CXCR4mut group (n = 3).No significant difference was observed between pts with/without CXCR4mut in Arms B and C. In Arm B, 1 DLT (grade 3 clinical TLS due to preexisting renal impairment) was reported at 1,200 mg; 1 grade 3 laboratory TLS, primarily attributed to dehydration and concomitant symptomatic therapies, occurred at 1,000 mg; abnormal electrolytes resolved after 1 day of drug interruption, without recurrence. Grade ≥ 3 lisaftoclax-related AEs included neutropenia (15.2%), thrombocytopenia (4.3%), decreased leukocytes (4.3%), TLS (4.3%), anemia (2.2%), weight loss (2.2%), and septic shock (2.2%). Ventricular arrhythmia was not observed. One pt required dose reduction because of neutropenia. The MTD was not reached. Lisaftoclax + ibrutinib showed a PK exposure comparable to lisaftoclax or ibrutinib alone, indicating no potential drug-drug interactions. Conclusions: Lisaftoclax alone and combined with ibrutinib or rituximab was well tolerated and demonstrated measurable effects in pts with naïve or BTKi-treatment-failed WM. (CT.gov: NCT04260217; Internal ID: APG2575WU101) *Co-first authors: ML and SA. Clinical trial information: NCT04260217.
Arm | A (n = 14) | B (n = 24) | C (n = 8) |
---|---|---|---|
Median age, yr (range) | 67.5 (48-75) | 65.0 (51-92) | 65.0 (54-72) |
Male, n (%) | 11 (78.6) | 18 (75.0) | 6 (75.0) |
IPSSWM high, n (%) | 8 (57.1) | 4 (16.7) | 2 (25.0) |
Lines of prior therapies, median (range) | 4.0 (1-7) | 0 | 2.5 (1-7) |
MYD88+/CXCR4+ | 4 | 9 | 1 |
MYD88+/CXCR4- | 5 | 13 | 6 |
MYD88-/CXCR4+ | 0 | 0 | 0 |
MYD88-/CXCR4- | 3 | 1 | 1 |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Saby George
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Sikander Ailawadhi
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Xuewen Ma
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Qing Zhou