Association between activating GNAS mutations and outcomes with chemotherapy in metastatic appendiceal adenocarcinoma.

Authors

null

Rushabh Gujarathi

Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

Rushabh Gujarathi , Christopher Rodman , Varun Vivek Bansal , Erika Belmont , Namrata Setia , Lindsay Alpert , John Hart , Mecker Moller , Oliver S. Eng , Grace Lee , Janet Chin , Manik A. Amin , Blase N. Polite , Chih-Yi Liao , Kiran Turaga , Ardaman Shergill

Organizations

Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, Department of Surgery, Section of Surgical Oncology, Yale Univesity Medical Center, New Haven, CT, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Hospitals, Chicago, IL, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange County, CA, Department of Surgery, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Data regarding predictive biomarkers in Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma (AA) is scarce. GNAS mutations, frequent in mucinous AA, have been linked with poor objective response (OR) to chemotherapy. We hypothesize that activating GNAS mutations are associated with differential outcomes for metastatic AA treated with chemotherapy. Methods: We reviewed the records of AA patients (pts) seen between 2013 and 2023. Pts who received 5-Flurouracil/Capecitabine (5-FU/Cape) based chemotherapy for at least 3 months (m) in the metastatic/recurrent setting (no chemotherapy for localized AA in prior 12 m) and had data available for GNAS mutations were included. The primary outcome was disease event-free survival (dEFS): the time from first dose of 5-FU/Cape given for metastatic/recurrent AA to the earliest disease event: death, radiographic recurrence in pts with complete cytoreduction (CC0), or clinical/radiographic progression. The secondary outcome was overall survival (OS). Associations between GNAS status, clinicopathologic features, and study outcomes were assessed using univariable and multivariable (for variables with p values < 0.2) Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Results: 48 pts were eligible. GNAS activating mutations (excluding variants of uncertain significance) were seen in 18/48 (37.5%), all at the R201 hotspot (R201H = 15, R201C= 3). Clinicopathologic characteristics between activating GNAS mutated (GNASmt) and GNAS wild-type (GNASwt) groups are compared in Table 1. Over a median follow-up of 29.83 m, GNASmt pts had worse dEFS (adjusted HR [aHR], 5.62; 95% CI, 1.65 – 19.12; p = 0.006), after adjusting for CC0 reduction, histology (mucinous vs. non-mucinous), and synchronous metastases (vs. metachronous). CC0 reduction (aHR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.21 – 0.88; p = 0.02) and synchronous metastases (aHR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.12 – 0.74; p = 0.009) were also associated with improved dEFS. There was no significant difference in OS between GNASmt vs. GNASwt pts (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.39 – 1.73; p = 0.61). Conclusions:GNAS mutated metastatic AAs show worse disease event free survival with chemotherapy which aligns with historic OR data. A previously reported survival benefit of GNAS mutations in AA, likely due to favorable disease at baseline (see table), is negated in the setting of metastatic disease treated with chemotherapy. Evaluating GNAS status as a predictive biomarker for AA is warranted.

Baseline comparison.

CharacteristicProportions in GNASmt vs. GNASwtp-value for Comparison of proportion(s)
Mucinous adenocarcinoma (vs. non-mucinous)16/18 vs. 5/30<0.001
Grade 1/2 (vs. Grade 3)13/18 vs. 10/300.009
Lymph Node Metastasis (vs. No metastasis/not assessed)2/18 vs. 11/300.06
Lymphovascular Invasion (N = 44)2/15 vs. 17/290.004
pM1c (vs. pM1b)2/18 vs. 6/300.47
CC0 reduction6/18 vs. 9/300.81
Metachronous Metastases (vs. Synchronous)3/18 vs. 5/300.99

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Other GI Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 16; abstr 4179)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.4179

Abstract #

4179

Poster Bd #

159

Abstract Disclosures