Post chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for metastatic pure seminoma.

Authors

Axel Heidenreich

Axel Heidenreich

Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Axel Heidenreich , Siamak Daneshmand , Yu Che , David A. Pfister , Pia Paffenholz , Alireza Ghoreifi , Stefanie Zschaebitz , Marcus Hentrich , Sophia Thy , Peter Albers , Clint Cary , Axel Gerdtsson , Anders Kjellman , Helene F. S. Negaard

Organizations

Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany, Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, Department of Urology, University Hospital, Duesseldorf, Germany, Department of Urology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany, Redcross Hospital, München, Germany, Department of Urology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, Lund University, University Hospital UMAS, Malmö, Sweden, Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden, Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Research Funding

no funding

Background: Surgical resection of post-chemotherapy residual masses for metastatic seminoma is discussed controversially with regard to oncological and functional outcome. Furthermore, the role of FDG-PET/CT to detect vital seminoma is still unclear. It is the aim of this study is to report the outcomes of patients with pure seminoma who underwent PC-RPLND. Methods: In this retrospective multi-institutional study, pure seminoma patients whounderwent PC-RPLND for marker negative, FDG-PET/CT positive residual masses > 3cm or marker negative retroperitoneal relapse following first line chemotherapy between 2000 and 2023 were included. Patients with residual masses and negative FDG-PET/CT, inadequate systemic chemotherapy, insufficient clinical data, positive markers, or with residual or relapsing masses following salvage chemotherapy were excluded. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were reviewed. Results: 109 patients were included. All patients received first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Clinical features of the patients are presented in the table. 92.6% of PC-RPLNDs were performed via an open transperitoneal approach. 61 (55.9%) and 48 (44.1%) pts underwent unilateral and a full bilateral resection, resp. Adjunctive surgery was performed in 46 (42%) pts, the most common of which were ureteral resection/repair in 16 (15%) pts, and vascular resection/repair in 14 (13%) pts. Median (IQR) blood loss and length of hospital stay were 550 (300 – 5800) mL and 4 (2 – 18) days, resp. Clavien - Dindo complications ≥ 3a developed in 11 (10.1%) pts. Final pathology revealed necrosis/fibrosis in 75 (69%) and seminoma in 34 (31%). FDG-PET/CT for residual masses > 3cm showed a positive predictive value of only 20%. Except for marker negative progression (p<0.001), no reliable clinicopathologic parameters were identified to predict presence of viable seminoma. With a median (IQR) follow-up of 56 (2 – 164) months, 15 (14%) patients relapsed (12 with lymph node, 3 with visceral/skeletal metastases). 3 (3%) patients died of disease. Conclusions: One third of patients with progressive or > 3cm FDG-PET-CT positive residual retroperitoneal masses following first-line chemotherapy for metastatic seminoma may have viable tumor. FDG-PET/CT has a poor positive predictive value and might be omitted as staging procedure. In selected cases, PC-RPLND may be a valuable option if performed in high-volume centers with expertise in testicular cancer management.

Clinical features of the patients.

VariableValue
Age at surgery, median (IQR), year40 (31 – 68)
Orchiectomy laterality, n (%)
Right
Left
bilateral
Extragonadal/NA

37 (34)
56 (51)
3 (2.7)
13 (12)
Clinical stage at initial diagnosis, n (%)
I
IIA/ IIB
IIC
III

8 (7.3)
31 (26)
50 (46)
20 (18)
IGCCCG risk group, n (%)
Good
Intermediate

88 (81)
21 (19)
Preoperative mass size, median (IQR), cm3,82 (2.1-14.9)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Germ Cell/Testicular Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 16; abstr 5037)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.5037

Abstract #

5037

Poster Bd #

355

Abstract Disclosures