Association of higher baseline stress and pain with clinical outcomes: Secondary analysis from Alliance A011502.

Authors

Shipra Gandhi

Shipra Gandhi

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY

Shipra Gandhi , Karla V. Ballman , Michelle D. Holmes , Kala Visvanathan , Banu Symington , Margaret Carvan , Carol Matyka , Anna Weiss , Eric P. Winer , Wajeeha Razaq , Lisa A. Carey , Ann H. Partridge , Wendy Y. Chen

Organizations

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, Sweetwater Regional Cancer Center, an Affiliate of Huntsman Cancer Institute, Rock Springs, WY, Patient Research Advocate Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Medford, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, University of Okahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Research Funding

U10CA180821, U10CA180882, UG1CA233196; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org.

Background: A011502 is a phase 3 randomized double-blind clinical trial that enrolled high-risk nonmetastatic breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) and randomized pts to aspirin 300 mg daily vs. placebo. There was no significant difference in invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) between the two arms. A secondary objective was to determine the association of inflammation-affiliated factors (stress, depression, poor sleep quality and pain) with iDFS and overall survival (OS). We hypothesized that these baseline factors are associated with worse clinical outcomes. Methods: At baseline, 2735, 2720, 2422 and 2610 pts completed Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised (CESD-R) respectively. Stress was categorized with PSS scores: low (0-13), moderate (14-26) or high stress (27-40). Pain was categorized with BPI scores: none/mild (0-3) or moderate/severe (≥4). Sleep quality was categorized with PSQI scores: good (0-5) or poor ( > 5).Depression was categorized with CESD-R scores: no depression (0-15) or depression (≥16). Associations between the measures of interest and outcomes were performed with multivariable Cox models controlling for age, body mass index, time since diagnosis, race, ethnicity, hormone receptor status and treatment arm. Results: Median follow up was 35 months. The associations from multivariable Cox model are shown in Table 1. Pts who reported high PSS had significantly worse iDFS and (non-significant) worse OS. Moderate/severe average (avg) pain was significantly associated with worse iDFS and OS. Poor sleep quality and depression were associated with worse iDFS and OS but not statistically significant. Conclusions: Pts reporting higher stress and pain at baseline had worse outcomes. We acknowledge that both pain and stress may be related to other non-cancer issues (chronic comorbidities). Our study highlights the need for clinical trials to consider including questionnaires to assess pt-reported outcomes. Future studies are warranted to determine if measures to decrease pain and stress would improve BC outcomes. U10CA180821, U10CA180882, UG1CA233196; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. NCT02927249: Clinical trial information: NCT02927249.

Association from adjusted Cox model.

iDFSOS
MeasurementEvents HR (95% CI) pEvents HR (95% CI) p
PSSLow
n = 1617
1441.00 (ref)0.04621.00 (ref)0.07
Moderate
n = 1051
850.96 (0.73, 1.26)401.04 (0.69, 1.56)
High
n = 64
112.13 (1.14, 3.96)62.55 (1.09, 5.93)
Avg BPINo/mild
n = 2254
1821.00 (ref)< 0.01751.00 (ref)< 0.01
Mod/severe
n = 464
591.57 (1.16, 2.14)332.09 (1.36, 3.19)
PSQIGood
n = 804
571.00 (ref)0.11221.00 (ref)0.10
Poor
n = 1615
1471.29 (0.95, 1.75)701.50 (0.92, 2.43)
CESD-RNot depressed
n = 2230
1931.00 (ref)0.14871.00 (ref)0.42
Depressed
n = 377
411.29 (0.92, 1.82)191.23 (0.74, 2.03)

HR: Hazard Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Rapid Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Track

Care Delivery and Quality Care

Sub Track

Patien Reported Outcomes

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02927249

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 16; abstr 11016)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.11016

Abstract #

11016

Abstract Disclosures