Updated safety and efficacy data from the phase 3 MANIFEST-2 study of pelabresib in combination with ruxolitinib for JAK inhibitor treatment-naïve patients with myelofibrosis.

Authors

null

Raajit Rampal

Department of Medicine, Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Raajit Rampal , Sebastian Grosicki , Dominik Chraniuk , Elisabetta Abruzzese , Prithviraj Bose , Aaron Thomas Gerds , Alessandro M. Vannucchi , Francesca Palandri , Sung-Eun Lee , Vikas Gupta , Alessandro Lucchesi , Andrew Tucker Kuykendall , Ruben A. Mesa , Jean-Jacques Kiladjian , Moshe Talpaz , Morgan Harris , Manlei Wu , Barbara Brown , Claire Harrison , John Mascarenhas

Organizations

Department of Medicine, Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland, Hematology Ward, Wojewódzki Szpital Zespolony im. L. Rydygiera, Toruń, Poland, Department of Hematology, S. Eugenio Hospital, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy, Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Istituto di Ematologia s. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy, Department of Hematology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea, Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy, Mofitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, Clinical Investigation Center, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, Constellation Pharmaceuticals, a MorphoSys Company, Boston, MA, MorphoSys US Inc., Boston, MA, Department of Haematology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Research Funding

Constellation Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a MorphoSys Company
The development of pelabresib was funded in part by Leukemia and Lymphoma Society

Background: Pelabresib (PELA) is an oral, small-molecule, investigational BET inhibitor that aims to decrease expression of genes involved in MF. MANIFEST-2 (NCT04603495), a global, randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study, investigated the efficacy and safety of PELA + ruxolitinib (PELA+RUX) vs placebo + RUX (PBO+RUX) in JAKi treatment-naïve patients (pts) with MF. Methods: Eligible pts had DIPSS score ≥ INT-1, platelet count ≥100 × 109/L, spleen volume ≥450 cm3, ≥2 symptoms with an average score ≥3 or total symptom score (TSS) ≥10 (MFSAF v4.0), peripheral blast count <5%, and ECOG PS ≤2. Pts were randomized 1:1. PELA or PBO was administered (QD for 14 consecutive days of 21) with RUX (BID for 21 days [1 cycle]). Primary endpoint was ≥35% spleen volume reduction from baseline (BL) (SVR35) at Week (Wk) 24. Secondary endpoints included absolute change in TSS and ≥50% reduction in TSS from BL (TSS50) at Wk 24, and safety. Other endpoints included hemoglobin (Hb) response (≥1.5 g/dL mean increase from BL without transfusions in the prior 12 wks), RBC transfusion number and bone marrow fibrosis (BMF). Results: As of Aug 31, 2023, 430 pts were randomized. At Wk 24, 65.9% (141/214) vs 35.2% (76/216) (p<0.001) of pts had an SVR35 response in the PELA+RUX vs PBO+RUX arms, respectively. SVR35 responders at any time were 80.4% (172/214) vs 50.0% (108/216); 80% (137/172) vs 63% (68/108) of responders reached SVR35 at Wk 12 scan; 83.7% (144/172) vs 79.6% (86/108) maintained response at cutoff. Mean change in absolute TSS was -15.99 (SE 1.028) vs -14.05 (SE 0.986) (p=0.0545), and TSS50 was 52.3% (112/214) vs 46.3% (100/216) (p=0.216) at Wk 24. There was a 2-fold difference in pts with both SVR35 and TSS50 with PELA+RUX (40.2% [86/214]) vs PBO+RUX (18.5% [40/216]). Hb response occurred in 10.7% (23/214) vs 6.0% (13/216) of pts, with differences in mean Hb levels maintained at 48 wks. In pts with anemia (Hb BL <10 g/dL), Hb response occurred in 16.4% (11/67) vs 14.1% (10/71). A total of 30.8% (66/214) vs 39.8% (86/216) of required RBC transfusion during the first 24 wks. BMF improvement ≥1 grade occurred in 38.5% (40/104) vs 24.2% (24/99) of pts (odds ratio 2.09; p=0.019). Of 426 pts evaluated for safety, the most common treatment-emergent AEs (≥20%) in the PELA+RUX vs PBO+RUX arms were anemia (43.9% vs 55.6% [Grade ≥3, 23.1% vs 36.4%]), thrombocytopenia (32.1% vs 23.4% [9% vs 5.6%]), platelet count decreased (20.8% vs 15.9% [4.2% vs 0.9%]), and diarrhea (23.1% vs 18.7% [0.5% vs 1.4%]). Updated results will be presented at the congress. Conclusions: PELA+RUX significantly and durably reduced splenomegaly, with a trend toward reduced TSS, and improved anemia and BMF at Wk 24 compared with PBO+RUX in JAKi treatment-naïve pts with MF, addressing key hallmarks of MF. Resultssupport a potential paradigm shift to combination therapy for MF. CH and JM contributed equally. Clinical trial information: NCT04603495.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) and Mast Cell Disorders

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04603495

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 16; abstr 6502)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.6502

Abstract #

6502

Abstract Disclosures