Initial screening efforts for the OPTIC RCC trial.

Authors

null

Scott Mattox Haake

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

Scott Mattox Haake , Katy Beckermann , Yu-Wei Chen , Anupama Reddy , Nataliya Mar , Moshe Chaim Ornstein , Pedro C. Barata , Tian Zhang , Sumanta Kumar Pal , W. Kimryn Rathmell , Brian I. Rini

Organizations

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, Moores Cancer Center at UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, Vindhya Data Science, Durham, NC, University of California, Irvine Health, Orange, CA, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

Research Funding

Department of Defense

Background: OPTIC RCC (NCT05361720) uses RNA sequencing (seq) of tumor tissue to assign therapy in front-line metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) patients. The operational characteristics of tumor tissue procurement, sequencing, cluster assignment and start of therapy are presented. Methods: Patients diagnosed with mccRCC without prior systemic therapy are eligible for enrollment. RNAseq of primary and/or metastatic tumor tissue is performed by Tempus (Chicago, IL) and data analyzed via an automated cloud-based informatics tool. Results: Twenty-three patients have been screened. Twelve patients (52%) had both primary and metastatic tumors submitted for RNAseq, 4 (17%) had primary only, and 7 (30%) had only metastatic tumor available. Three patients (13%) failed screening because no tumors passed RNAseq quality control (QC). When possible, patients were assigned to clusters based on data from metastatic tumor (15/20, 75%). However, 5/20 (25%) of patients were assigned to clusters based on primary tumor sequencing data because the metastatic tumor was not available or failed QC. Eight patients (40%) were assigned to cluster 1/2, 7 (35%) were assigned to cluster 4/5, and 5 (25%) were assigned to cluster 3/6/7. Primary tumors were more likely to be assigned to cluster 1/2 (12/14, 86%) than metastatic tumors (5/10, 50%) (p<0.01, Fisher’s exact test). Of the 9 pts with both primary and metastatic RNAseq, 5 patients had discordant tumor clusters (primary cluster 1/2 and metastatic cluster 4/5 or 3/6/7); 4 patients with concordant tumor clusters (both cluster 1/2). The mean time from consent to cluster assignment was 32 days (SD +/- 18), though this improved over time. Ten patients have started therapy. Conclusions: Patients with mccRCC can be enrolled on clinical trials that utilize tissue-based RNA sequencing biomarkers. Accrual and analysis correlating cluster assignment with treatment response are ongoing. This trial is funded by the DOD Kidney Cancer Research Program (W81XWH-22-1-1033). Clinical trial information: NCT05361720.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer

Sub Track

Translational Research, Tumor Biology, Biomarkers, and Pathology

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT05361720

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 4; abstr 478)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.478

Abstract #

478

Poster Bd #

K19

Abstract Disclosures