Overall survival with darolutamide vs placebo in combination with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and docetaxel: A sensitivity analysis from ARASENS accounting for subsequent therapy.

Authors

null

Neal D. Shore

Carolina Urologic Research Center, Genesis Care Clinics, Myrtle Beach, SC

Neal D. Shore , Bertrand F. Tombal , Maha H. A. Hussain , Fred Saad , Karim Fizazi , Cora N. Sternberg , E. David Crawford , Todd Fralich , Rui Li , Matthew Raymond Smith

Organizations

Carolina Urologic Research Center, Genesis Care Clinics, Myrtle Beach, SC, Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, University of Montreal Hospital Center, Montreal, QC, Canada, Gustave Roussy, University of Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France, Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Department of Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Whippany, NJ, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Bayer and Orion Pharma

Background: Darolutamide (DARO) + ADT + docetaxel (DOC) is approved for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) based on the phase 3 ARASENS study (NCT02799602). To address the impact of informative intercurrent events (eg, use of subsequent therapy) in censored patients (pts), as defined by the European Medicines Agency, we performed a post hoc sensitivity analysis of OS. Methods: Pts with mHSPC were randomized 1:1 to oral DARO 600 mg twice daily or placebo (PBO) + ADT + DOC. The primary endpoint was OS using a log-rank test, with HR (95% CI) calculated by Cox model, stratified by extent of disease (EoD; nonregional lymph node vs bone ± lymph node vs visceral ± lymph node/bone metastases) and alkaline phosphatase (< vs ≥ upper limit of normal). Pts with no documented death were censored at last known alive or data cut-off date, whichever was earlier. The post hoc sensitivity analysis counted initiation of subsequent systemic antineoplastic therapy as an event in censored pts still alive at end of follow-up. In addition planned sensitivity analyses used an unstratified log-rank test/Cox model, a log-rank test/Cox model with stratification factors from electronic case report forms, and a log-rank test/Cox model with EoD stratification factors from central imaging review. Results: In the primary analysis DARO + ADT + DOC significantly improved OS (P<0.0001; Table), despite a high percentage of pts who entered follow-up in the PBO group receiving subsequent life-prolonging systemic therapies (374/495, 76%). Time to first subsequent systemic antineoplastic therapy (a key secondary endpoint) was significantly longer with DARO + ADT + DOC vs PBO + ADT + DOC (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.33–0.46, P<0.001). Findings from the post hoc sensitivity analysis counting initiation of subsequent systemic antineoplastic therapy as an event in censored pts (pts with events: DARO 300/651, 46.1%; PBO 476/654, 72.8%) and the planned sensitivity analyses were consistent and supported the primary OS analysis (Table). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were similar between groups. TEAEs led to DARO/PBO discontinuation in 13.5%/10.6% of pts. Conclusions: The results of the post hoc and planned sensitivity analyses were consistent with and supportive of the ARASENS primary OS analysis. These data reinforce DARO + ADT + DOC as an effective and well tolerated new standard of care for early treatment intensification in pts with mHSPC. Clinical trial information: NCT02799602.

ARASENS OS sensitivity analyses.

AnalysisHR (95% CI) DARO vs PBO
Primary OS analysis0.68 (0.57–0.80)
Sensitivity analyses
Counting initiation of subsequent systemic antineoplastic therapy as an event in censored pts0.47 (0.40–0.54)
Unstratified0.69 (0.58–0.82)
Using stratification factors based on eCRF0.68 (0.57–0.81)
Using EoD stratification factors from central imaging review0.68 (0.57–0.81)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02799602

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 4; abstr 166)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.166

Abstract #

166

Poster Bd #

G16

Abstract Disclosures