Cabozantinib plus pembrolizumab as first-line therapy for cisplatin-ineligible advanced urothelial carcinoma (PemCab).

Authors

null

Rohit K. Jain

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

Rohit K. Jain , Umang Swami , Mehmet Asim Bilen , Kenneth M. Boucher , Jacqueline T Brown , Jad Chahoud , Sumati Gupta , Neeraj Agarwal , Guru P. Sonpavde , Benjamin L. Maughan

Organizations

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, Hunstman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, AdventHealth Medical Group, Orlando, FL

Research Funding

Exelixis

Background: Pembrolizumab (pem) was initially approved in the first line setting for cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients (pts) with high PD-L1 expression and platinum ineligible pts regardless of PD-L1 status; this later changed to only platinum ineligible pts. There is a high disease progression (PD) rate with pem monotherapy. Cabozantinib (cabo) is a multiple receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting MET and VEGFR2 approved in multiple other malignancies as monotherapy or in combination with PD-1 inhibition. We hypothesized that combination of pem and cabo therapy will be safe and efficacious in patients with treatment naïve mUC. Methods: This is a phase II, open label, multi-center, single arm trial evaluating the tolerability and activity of pem 200 mg every 3 weeks and cabo 40 mg daily as first-line treatment for patients with mUC. Key inclusion criteria were histologically proven locally advanced or mUC, ECOG-PS 0-2, cisplatin-ineligible (including patient refusal of cisplatin), treatment naïve, and no prior PD-1/L1 therapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). There was a lead-in safety cohort of 6 pts. We hypothesized that combination therapy would improve ORR to > 32%. With 35 evaluable subjects, the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval would extend no more than 26% from the observed proportion. With ≥17 objective responses, the confidence interval excludes 32%. Results: Between December 26, 2018, and April 19, 2023, 36 pts were enrolled of which 35 were evaluable for response with the median follow up of 14.4 months (95% CI 12.2 – 16.2). The median age was 72.5y [range, 47-82]; ECOG PS 0-1 in 89% pts. Responses were observed in 15 pts (ORR= 42.8%) including complete responses in 5 pts (14.3%). Stable disease was seen in 10 pts (28.6%). The disease control rate was 68.5% (25/35). Median PFS was 7.7 months (95% CI 4.2 – 11.2). Fifty-two percent of pts developed any grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) attributable to either cabozantinib or pembrolizumab. The most common grade 1/2 TRAE were diarrhea, anorexia, dysgeusia, weight loss, and nausea. Forty-four percent pts developed grade 3/4 TRAEs most common being hypertension, hypophosphatemia, alanine transaminase elevation, diarrhea, and fatigue. Conclusions: This novel phase II trial of pem + cabo demonstrated a manageable toxicity profile and promising efficacy as first-line therapy in mUC including patient’s ineligible for cisplatin. Further investigation with a focus on predictive biomarkers is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03534804.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Oral Abstract Session B: Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03534804

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 4; abstr 539)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.539

Abstract #

539

Abstract Disclosures