Cytoreductive nephrectomy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with immunotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors

null

Fengnian Zhao

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Fengnian Zhao , Junru Chen , Haoyang Liu , Hao Zeng

Organizations

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Research Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China
1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province, Clinical and Translational Medicine Research Project, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing Bethune Charitable Foundation, Postdoctoral Research and Development Fund of West China Hospital of Sichuan University

Background: lmmunotherapy is changing the treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). In recent years, many immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICls) have been introduced, and ICl-combination therapies have changed the treatment landscape for patients with mRCC. However, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in patients with mRCC receiving ICls is not clear. We aimed to assess the role of ICl-combination therapies in patients receiving /not receiving CN. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for English-language clinical trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies evaluating OS in patients with mRCC who underwent /did not undergo CN (end-of-search date: 1 April 2023). The hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [CI] for OS obtained by multivariate analysis were extracted and aggregated. Meta-analysis was performed using Review manager 5.4.1, and p<0.05 was defined as a statistical significance. Results: Eleven studies met the eligibility criteria. Receiving CN+ICI combination therapy was associated with significantly better OS than patients receiving ICI combination therapy alone (HR: 0.56,95% CI: 0.46-0.69, P < 0.001). In subgroup analyses, thinking about the number of lines for immunotherapy, CN provided OS benefit when immunotherapy was used as either first-line (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.41-0.70, P < 0.001) or non-first-line treatment (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.44-0.81, P = 0.001). In terms of tumor pathologic type, CN also provided OS benefit no matter the pathologic type was only clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.28-0.95, P = 0.03) or not (HR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.39-0.75, P < 0.001). For the choice of drugs, CN provided OS benefits with nivolumab/nivolumab + ipilimumab (HR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.32-0.79, P = 0.003) or immunotherapy combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.48-0.73, P < 0.001). About the timing of CN, CN also provided OS benefit when performing before immunotherapy (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.54-0.73, P < 0.001) or no strictly restricted (HR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.33-0.74, P = 0.0007). Conclusions: CN brings good effect on OS in mRCC patients treated with ICI-combination therapies. In ICI-combination therapy era, the role of CN still deserves attention.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 4; abstr 427)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.427

Abstract #

427

Poster Bd #

H9

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts