Final study analysis of PRINT: Prostate cancer intensive, non–cross-reactive therapy for CRPC.

Authors

null

Bobby Chi-Hung Liaw

Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Bobby Chi-Hung Liaw , Himanshu Joshi , Tianxiang Sheng , Che-Kai Tsao , Matt D. Galsky , Richard Lorne Bakst , Robert Stewart , Richard Stock , William K. Oh

Organizations

Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY

Research Funding

Sanofi
Bayer

Background: The long-standing approach to mCRPC management has been to treat sequentially with one agent until resistance is met. PRINT explores the efficacy of treating mCRPC with a rapidly-cycling, non–cross-reactive regimen as a way to more effectively treat an intrinsic heterogeneous disease, delay or prevent drug resistance, and minimize treatment toxicity. Methods: All patients receive treatment with 3 consecutive treatment modules, each lasting 12 weeks: 1. abiraterone acetate 1000 mg PO daily + prednisone 5 mg PO BID; 2. cabazitaxel 20 mg/m2 IV + carboplatin AUC 4 IV q3 weeks; 3. enzalutamide 160 mg PO daily + radium-223 55 kBq/kg IV q4 weeks. Upon completion of regimen, patients are followed on ADT alone. Primary endpoint for the study is time to progression (TTP), either by PSA or imaging. Secondary endpoints are PSA response rate with each module, changes to alkaline phosphatase levels, and safety. Results: From 3/2017 to 11/2020, 40 men with mCRPC were enrolled, with 33 completing the 9-month study regimen and evaluable for endpoint analysis. With median follow up of 139 weeks, median TTP after regimen completion was 15.9 weeks (95% CI 10.6-25.0 weeks), which did not meet prespecified TTP of 20 weeks to be considered a significant improvement over standard management. PSA response rates showed successive improvement with each sequential treatment module (Table). 77.8% of patients with elevated baseline alkaline phosphatase levels had normalization post-treatment. Previously reported, the treatment regimen was well-tolerated, with few grade 3/4 AE’s attributable by the investigator to the study regimen. Five patients (15.2%) were able to remain on post-study surveillance with ADT alone without the addition of a mCRPC agent for over a year, with one patient subsequently discontinuing ADT with PSA remaining undetectable in setting of recovering testosterone levels. Conclusions: Treatment of mCRPC with a rapidly cycling non–cross-reactive regimen did not significantly improve time to disease progression as compared to standard management. However, it is associated with significant antitumor response, with potential for long-term suppression of disease. Additional analysis into clinicopathologic and genomic factors that may predict for prolonged disease control is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02903160.

PSA response rates compared to baseline by treatment module.

Module 1
Abiraterone
Module 2
Cabazi/Carbo
Module 3
Enza/Radium
>90% PSA Reduction36.4%57.6%69.7%
>50% PSA Reduction84.8%93.9%97.0%

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02903160

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 4; abstr 147)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.147

Abstract #

147

Poster Bd #

F18

Abstract Disclosures