Preoperative risk factors related to relapse-free survival after R0 resection of gallbladder cancer.

Authors

null

Sang Hun Lee

Department of Internal Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, South Korea

Sang Hun Lee , Yong Mi Seol , Dong Uk Kim

Organizations

Department of Internal Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, South Korea

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Gallbladder (GB) cancer shows high prevalence in South Korea, and tends to be fatal. In surgically fit patients, radical resection aiming R0 margin combined with lymphadenectomy is the mainstay of curative-intent therapy. In spite of R0 resection, however, high recurrence rate is observed in GB cancer, demanding a need to find out risk factors related to recurrence after surgery. Methods: This is a single center, retrospective cohort study conducted on 148 patients with GB cancer who underwent R0 resection between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2019. Several variables were analyzed with statistical tools to identify risk factors related to prognosis. Relapse free survival (RFS), defined as time from treatment of disease to any event, was analyzed with Cox regression analysis. Results: Based on statistical analysis, risk factors related to RFS were age over 65 (hazard ratio [HR] 3.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.71 – 8.56, p= .001), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level more than 6.5% (HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.31 – 5.66, p=0.007), surgical T stage more than T3 (HR 5.60, 95% CI 3.05 – 10.25, p<0.001), surgical N stage more than N1 (HR 4.07, 95% CI 2.25 – 7.36, p<0.001), pathologic differentiation of moderate or poor differentiation (HR 2.80, 95% CI 1.46 – 5.37, p=0.002), reversed albumin-globulin ratio (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.06 – 0.40, p<0.001), and high gamma glutamyl peptidase (GGT) level (HR 1.00, 95% CI 1.00 – 1.00, p<0.001). Conclusions: Advanced pathologic stage and high inflammatory marker levels, reflecting high tumor burden, were related with poor surgical outcome. Interestingly, high HbA1c level was related to reduced RFS as well. In conclusion, active screening for early detection, reducing inflammatory conditions, and managing diabetes might enhance RFS after R0 resection of GB cancer.

Univariate Analysis
VariableOR95% CIP
Age (≥ 65 vs < 65)3.82(1.71 - 8.56).001
Sex (male vs female)1.86(1.04 - 3.32).036
BMI (kg/m2) (≥ 25.0 vs < 25.0)0.78(0.39 - 1.53).463
Smoking (yes vs no)1.91(0.95 - 3.85).071
Alcohol (yes or no)1.20(0.61 - 2.35).606
Cholesterol (≥ 200.0 vs < 200.0)0.98(0.46 - 2.11).962
HbA1C (≥ 6.5 vs < 6.5)2.72(1.31 - 5.66).007
Viral hepatitis (yes vs no)1.95(0.70 - 5.44).204
Liver Cirrhosis (yes vs no)1.20(0.43 - 3.36).728
Biliary inflammation
(Cholecystolithiasis + Cholecystitis vs no)
0.55(0.29 - 1.05).070
Surgical T stage (T3 + T4 vs T1 + T2)5.60(3.05 - 10.25)<.001
Surgical N stage (N1 + N2 vs N0)4.07(2.25 - 7.36)<.001
Pathology differentiation (Non-well vs Well)2.80(1.46 - 5.37).002
WBC0.99(0.93 - 1.06).829
AST1.00(1.00 - 1.00).964
ALT1.00(0.99 - 1.00).773
Bilirubin1.06(0.98 - 1.15).129
Total protein0.85(0.58 - 1.24).395
Albumin0.39(0.23 - 0.65)<.001
Albumin-Globulin ratio (≥ 1.0 vs < 1.0)0.16(0.06 - 0.40)<.001
BUN1.00(0.93 - 1.07).951
creatinine0.98(0.26 - 3.65).971
PT INR8.04(0.76 - 85.38).084
GGT1.00(1.00 - 1.00)<.001
CA19-9 (≥ 39.0 vs < 39.0)1.72(0.94-3.17).080

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Pancreatic Cancer,Hepatobiliary Cancer,Neuroendocrine/Carcinoid,Small Bowel Cancer

Sub Track

Other

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 3; abstr 566)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.3_suppl.566

Abstract #

566

Poster Bd #

G14

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Hiroaki Yanagimoto

First Author: Amelie Dutheil

First Author: Ahmed Bilal Khalid