Safety and efficacy of nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors

null

Vikas S. Ostwal

Tata Memorial Hospital (HBNI), Mumbai, India

Vikas S. Ostwal , ATUL SHARMA , Joydeep Ghosh , Rakesh Reddy , Lakshmi Priyadarshini K , B. J. Srinivas , Ramaiyer Raghu Raman , Rajesh Kota , Soumya Surath Panda , Amit Agarwal , Arun Seshachalam , Bhushan Tapiram Nemade , Ateeq Ahmad , Saifuddin Sheikh , Shoukath M Ali , Mahesh Paithankar , Lav Patel , Anil Rajani , Deepak Bunger , Imran Ahmad

Organizations

Tata Memorial Hospital (HBNI), Mumbai, India, IRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, India, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India, Mahatma Gandhi Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, Visakhapatnam, India, HCG Curie City Cancer Centre, Vijayawada, India, HealthCare Global Enterprises Ltd., Bangalore, India, MNJ Institute of Oncology & Regional Cancer Centre, Hyderabad, India, Anu Hospital, Vijayawada, India, IMS & SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India, BLK-Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India, Dr. GVN Cancer Institute, Tiruchirappalli, India, Navsanjeevani Hospital Nashik, Nashik, India, Jina Pharmaceuticals Inc, Libertyville, IL, Jina Pharmaceuticals, Libertyville, IL, Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Ahmedabad, India

Research Funding

Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India

Background: Nanosomal docetaxel lipid suspension (NDLS) was developed to overcome toxicity issues associated with conventional docetaxel. Docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; DCF) or modified DCF (mDCF) is one of the recommended first-line regimens for patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC). However, majority of the patients experienced grade 3/4 toxicities with DCF regimen using conventional docetaxel. The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of NDLS-based mDCF/DCF regimens in patients with metastatic GAC. Methods: In this multicentric, open-label, clinical trial, patients with previously untreated metastatic GAC were enrolled. Patients received either mDCF [NDLS 40 mg/m2 on day 1 (D1), C 40 mg/m2 on D2 or D3, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus on D1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 on D1, 5-FU 1000 mg/m2/day continuous infusion D1 & 2; q2w] for 9 cycles, or DCF [NDLS 75 mg/m2 on D1, C 75 mg/m2 on D1, 5-FU 750 mg/m2/day for 5 days given as continuous infusion; q3w] for 6 cycles. Prophylactic GCSF (Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor)/Peg-GCSF support was allowed in all patients. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at week 18. Secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety outcomes. Patients were followed up to 1 year. Results: Fifty-two patients were enrolled, with mean (±SD) age of 52 (±9.6) years & male:female ratio of 32:20. Thirty-eight patients qualified for modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis for efficacy evaluation (mDCF: 33; DCF:5). At week 18, ORR was 57.9% & DCR was 81.6% in mITT population. In the per-protocol population (n=26), ORR was 61.5% at 18 weeks (mDCF:63.6%; DCF:50%). Safety set included all 52 patients. Any grade adverse events (AEs) were reported in 90.4% (n=47) of the patients; with 40.4% experiencing grade 3/4 AEs. All-grade AEs reported in ≥10% of the patients included anemia, neutropenia, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, mucositis, decreased appetite, peripheral neuropathy; with majority of AEs being grade 1/2. Most common grade 3/4 AE was neutropenia; observed in 17.3% (n=9) patients (mDCF: 14%; DCF: 33.3%). Conclusions: NDLS-based regimens demonstrated efficacy & improved safety profile in the treatment of metastatic GAC. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2018/01/011450.

Efficacy outcomes.
ParametermITT population (n=38)mDCF (n=33)DCF (n=5)
CR, n (%)1 (2.6)1 (3.0)0 (0)
PR, n (%)21 (55.3)18 (54.5)3 (60)
SD, n (%)9 (23.7)8 (24.2)1 (20)
ORR, n (%) [95% CI]22 (57.9) [40.8, 73.7]19 (57.6) [39.2, 74.5]3 (60) [14.7, 94.7]
DCR, n (%) [95% CI]31 (81.6) [65.7, 92.2]27 (81.8) [64.5, 93]4 (80) [28.3, 99.5]
Median PFS (months), [95% CI]8.4 [5.6, 9.1]9 [5.1, 9.1]8.1 [1.9, NE]
Median OS (months)NRNRNR

NE: not estimable; NR: not reached.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach and Other Gastrointestinal Cancers

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

CTRI/2018/01/011450

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 3; abstr 348)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.3_suppl.348

Abstract #

348

Poster Bd #

G9

Abstract Disclosures