Larynx-preserving treatment strategy for patients with resectable cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors

null

Yasuhiro Tsubosa

Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan

Yasuhiro Tsubosa , Masazumi Inoue , Kazunori Tokizawa , Shuhei Mayanagi

Organizations

Division of Esophageal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Nagaizumi-Cho, Sunto-Gun, Japan

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Preservation of the larynx is an important treatment strategy for cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (CESCC), because surgery for CESCC often involves laryngectomy. At our hospital, we actively perform dCRT (cisplatin + 5-fluorouarcil + radiation 60Gy) to preserve laryngeal function. In this study, we compared the treatment results of esophagectomy and definitive chemoradiation (dCRT) for resectable CESCC and examined larynx-preserving treatment strategies. Methods: Patients who were treated for resectable CESCC at our hospital from January 2003 to March 2019 were divided into surgery group and dCRT group for the initial treatment. All patients were eligible for both treatments. The treatment results were compared retrospectively. Results: Of all 61 patients, 23 patients received surgery and 38 received dCRT. There was no significant difference in patients’ characteristics between 2 groups. In surgery group, 19 cases lost their laryngeal function by surgery (82.6%). Recurrence was observed in 7 cases, of which only 3 case was local. In CRT group, 33 cases (86.8%) achieved complete response, of which 16 cases relapsed. 8 cases (21.1%) lost their laryngeal function by additional surgery after dCRT. There was no significant difference in 5-year survival rate between two groups (surgery, 60.8%; dCRT, 70.1%; p = 0.750). In dCRT group, 5-year laryngeal-preserving survival rate was 64.8%, and esophageal stenosis before treatment was the independent risk factor for non-larynx preservation. 5-year laryngeal-preserving survival rate was 78.5%, and 5-year survival rate was 85.4% for non-stenotic cases in dCRT group, which were significantly higher than those for stenotic cases. 5-year laryngeal-preserving survival rate was also high in the patients with Ce localized tumor (72.6%). In those patients, non-stenotic patients and cT1-T3 patients had significantly high 5-year laryngeal-preserving survival rate (87.5% and 92.3%). Conclusions: dCRT for CESCC was comparable to surgery in terms of long-term prognosis, and the rate of larynx preservation was high. Among the cases where the tumor was localized to Ce, the laryngeal preservation rate was particularly high in non-stenotic cases and cases with cT1-T3, and dCRT should be actively indicated for these cases.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach and Other Gastrointestinal Cancers

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 3; abstr 311)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.3_suppl.311

Abstract #

311

Poster Bd #

E11

Abstract Disclosures