Financial toxicity from PARP inhibitors in castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors

null

David Joseph Benjamin

Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, CA

David Joseph Benjamin , Nataniel Hernan Lester-Coll , Arash Rezazadeh

Organizations

Hoag Family Cancer Institute, Newport Beach, CA, Department of Surgical Pathology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Approximately 5-10% of men with prostate cancer (PC) are eligible for treatment with PARP inhibitors. As an estimated 120,000 men living in the US have metastatic PC, between 6,000-12,000 men may be eligible for treatment with PARP inhibitors. Recently, several PARP inhibitors have been approved as single or combination therapies in the first-line castrate-resistant (CR) setting and later-line setting including: olaparib, olaparib plus abiraterone (AAP), and talazoparib plus enzalutamide. It is unclear if these newly approved therapies may be cost prohibitive for patients and/or health care systems. Methods: Using average sale price data from UpToDate for PARP inhibitors and novel hormone therapies (NHTs), we calculated the total cost of treatment for each single or combination therapy regimen. We used phase II/III clinical trial data to determine the median duration of treatment for each regimen. Results: The three approved PARP inhibitors have total costs in descending order as follows: AAP plus olaparib ($689,813.77), talazoparib plus enzalutamide ($388,390.46), and olaparib ($202,845.22). In comparison, in the PROfound trial, the cost of AAP alone was $192,140.37 and in the TALAPRO-2 trial, the cost of enzalutamide alone was $ 253,780.80. The difference in estimated cost between olaparib plus AAP versus talazoparib plus enzalutamide per patient is $37,970.29. Conclusions: Despite several new approved therapies in BRCA mutated and HRR mutated mPC, the total costs for PARP inhibitors remain prohibitive for health care institutions. The estimated difference between two newly approved PARP plus NHT regimens could translate in a difference of $455,643,480 in healthcare system costs if all eligible U.S. men received treatment with olaparib plus AAP over talazoparib plus enzalutamide.

Estimated costs associated with treatment of PARP inhibitors in mPC.

Drug Name(s)Trial NameDosingCost per DayMedian Duration of TreatmentTotal Estimated Costs
Olaparib plus AbirateronePROfoundOlaparib 300 mg PO BID$953.22 with olaparib; $437.08 total (435.48 for AAP plus 1.60 for prednisone)17.5 months of olaparib; 18.2 months of AAP$ 467,077.80 (olaparib) + $ 222,735.97 (AAP) = $689,813.77
Talazoparib plus EnzalutamideTALAPRO-2Talazoparib 0.5 mg PO daily plus enzalutamide 160 mg PO daily$700.56 with talazoparib; $546.00 with enzalutamide19.8 months with talazoparib and 22.2 months with enzalutamide$ 388,390.46 (talazoparib) + $ 339,393.60 (enzalutamide) = $ 727,784.06
OlaparibPROPELOlaparib 300 mg PO BID$953.22 with olaparib7.6 months$ 202,845.22
AbirateronePROfoundAbiraterone 1,000 mg plus prednisone 5 mg PO BID$437.08 total (435.48 for AAP plus 1.60 for prednisone)15.7 months$ 192,140.37
EnzalutamideTALAPRO-2Enzalutamide 160 mg PO daily$54616.6 months with enzalutamide in placebo group$ 253,780.80

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement and Real-World Evidence

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 4; abstr 54)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.4_suppl.54

Abstract #

54

Poster Bd #

B11

Abstract Disclosures