Survival after esophagectomy for metastatic esophageal cancer: Should surgery’s role be reconsidered?

Authors

null

Samir H Saeed

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

Samir H Saeed , Andrew J Sinnamon , Jacques P Fontaine , Rutika Mehta , Jobelle Joyce Anne Baldonado , Luis R Pena , Russell F Palm , Sarah E. Hoffe , Jessica M. Frakes , Jose Mario Pimiento

Organizations

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Standard treatment for stage IV esophageal cancer (EC) is systemic therapy, with surgery considered contraindicated. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of surgical resection on outcomes for patients with metastatic EC. Methods: We reviewed our institution’s IRB-approved database of 1334 esophagectomies from 1994 to 2023 and identified 18 patients with distant disease (stage IV) by AJCC8 found prior to or during surgery. Chi-Square, ANOVA, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used to compare demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival from time of surgery in those with metastatic versus non-metastatic EC. Results: Most metastatic patients were male (89%), Caucasian (83%), and had adenocarcinoma (89%). Compared to the non-metastatic cohort, stage IV EC cases were younger (57 vs 63; p=0.03), non-Caucasian (17% vs 6%; p=<0.001), and more likely to get chemotherapy (41% vs 8%; p=0.04) or immunotherapy (23.5% vs 0%; p=0.06), with no difference in gender (89% vs 83%) and receipt of chemoradiotherapy (94% vs 92%). While the difference in intra-operative complication rates was significant (13% vs 2%; p=0.001), both groups had similar rates of post-operative complications (p=0.95). Non-regional nodal metastasis had the most favorable outcome (mOS NR; median follow-up=14m); while peritoneal/omental disease had the shortest survival (5.2m). Patients receiving surgery more than a year after stage IV diagnosis (n=6) had better survival than those who either underwent resection within a year after diagnosis (n=2) or had metastasis identified at time of surgery (n=8) (p=0.02). PDL-1 positive and HER2-neu positive tumors also had better outcomes, with neither group reaching median survival. Conclusions: Esophagectomy for highly selected patients with distant disease demonstrates similar post-operative complication rates to locally advanced EC. For stage IV patients, a short interval from diagnosis to surgery is associated with worse survival; however, prolonged diagnosis-to-surgery interval >12m and PDL-1 and HER2-neu positivity demonstrate better outcomes. Surgery’s role in treatment of stage IV EC preferably more than a year after diagnosis of metastasis should be further studied.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cancers of the Esophagus and Stomach and Other Gastrointestinal Cancers

Track

Esophageal and Gastric Cancer,Other GI Cancer

Sub Track

Other

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 3; abstr 410)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.3_suppl.410

Abstract #

410

Poster Bd #

K15

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Jesus C. Fabregas

First Author: Huayuan Liang

First Author: Sameh Hany Emile