Molecular differences with therapeutic implications in early-onset compared to average-onset cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors

Thejus Jayakrishnan

Thejus Jayakrishnan

Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH

Thejus Jayakrishnan , Yasmine Baca , Joanne Xiu , Mehrie Patel , Benjamin Adam Weinberg , Emil Lou , Jashodeep Datta , Moh'd M. Khushman , Pat Gulhati , Sanjay Goel , Tiago Biachi de Castria , Vaia Florou , Kanika G. Nair , Suneel Deepak Kamath , Alok A. Khorana

Organizations

Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University, Washington, DC, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL, Washington University in St. Louis, Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa Bay, FL, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT

Research Funding

No funding sources reported

Background: Early-onset cholangiocarcinoma (eoCCA) is among early-onset cancers with the fastest rising rates, yet little is known about its biology. We sought to compare the molecular characteristics of eoCCA with average-onset CCA (aoCCA) with an age cut-off of 50 years, utilizing a real-world multi-omics dataset. Methods: The study comprised patients whose tumors underwent molecular analysis at Caris Life Sciences (Phoenix, AZ) using whole exome and whole transcriptome analyses. Patients were categorized by age as eoCCA defined as <50 years and aoCCA >50 years. Gene expression profiles were analyzed for transcriptional signatures predictive of immunotherapy response including the T-cell inflamed score (TIS) and interferon-gamma (IFG) score. P values (adjusted for multiple testing) were considered significant at False Discovery Rate (FDR)P<0.05 for molecular comparisons and FDR P<0.25 for Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Insurance claims data was used for survival comparison using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Results: The study included 5587 patients - 453 patients with eoCCA and 5134 with aoCCA (Table). Of targetable mutations (FGFR2, IDH1, IDH2, ERBB2, BRCA, BRAF), FGFR2 fusion was significantly more prevalent in eoCCA (15.7% vs 5.9% in aoCCA, FDR P<0.001). Rates trended higher in eoCCAfor MSI-H tumors (4.1% vs 2.4%), and high tumor mutational burden (6.1% vs 5.1%) but not significantly different (FDR P=1). The IFG score (Fold Change FC: 1.1, FDR P=0.01) and TIS (FC:17.3, FDR P=0.03) were significantly higher in aoCCA vs eoCCA. On GSEA, angiogenesis was enriched in eoCCA (normalized enrichment score NES=1.51, FDR P=0.16) while IFG (NES= -1.58, FDR P =0.06) and inflammatory response (NES= -1.46, FDR P=0.18) were enriched in aoCCA. Median OS was longer in eoCCA (16.5 vs 13.3 months, Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.86, 95%CI 0.78-0.95, P=0.004). Among patients treated with immunotherapy, median OS was longer in patients with eoCCA (19.2 months, n=19) vs aoCCA (7.6 months, n=150) - HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.28-0.94, p=0.03. No survival difference was identified in patients on chemotherapy (HR 0.91, 95%CI 0.76-1.08, P=0.28). Conclusions: In the largest age-stratified analysis of molecular characteristics of CCA, we identified crucial differences, including higher prevalence of FGFR2 fusions and significant differences in immunotherapy-related markers, angiogenesis enrichment, and inflammatory response. Patients with eoCCA experienced better outcomes with immunotherapy even though immune-oncology-relevant markers favored aoCCA. Our findings, especially higher FGFR2 fusion prevalence in eoCCA, underscore the need for NGS testing and the potential for age-tailored therapeutic strategies.

CharacteristiceoCCAaoCCA
Median Age (years)4468
Sex: Female60.7%54.6%
Sex: Male39.3%45.4%
Primary Tumor Site
Intrahepatic57%53%
Extrahepatic14%16%
Gallbladder21%23%
Others8%8%

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Cancers of the Pancreas, Small Bowel, and Hepatobiliary Tract

Track

Pancreatic Cancer,Hepatobiliary Cancer,Neuroendocrine/Carcinoid,Small Bowel Cancer

Sub Track

Tumor Biology, Biomarkers, and Pathology

Citation

J Clin Oncol 42, 2024 (suppl 3; abstr 536)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2024.42.3_suppl.536

Abstract #

536

Poster Bd #

F3

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Incidence and prognostic value of actionable mutations in early-stage resectable cholangiocarcinoma.

First Author: Kailey Morgan Oppat

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (phCCA): A comparative comprehensive genomic profiling study.

First Author: Parth J Sampat

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Prevalence of next generation sequencing testing and targetable mutations in cholangiocarcinoma.

First Author: Anuj Shah

Abstract

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Landscape of BRAF mutation classes in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

First Author: Tin-Yun Tang