Defining and evaluating potentially preventable ED visits in oncology patients including using early machine learning models.

Authors

null

Sonal Gandhi

Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

Sonal Gandhi, Lauren Fleshner, Monika K. Krzyzanowska, Alex Kiss, Ivy Cheng, William Tran

Organizations

Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, University of Toronto, Institute of Medical Science, Toronto, ON, Canada, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Cancer patients are frequent users of the emergency department (ED); preventing such visits is important for improving the quality of cancer care and decreasing health care system burden. This study describes oncology ED visits at a single institution, and seeks to define a novel definition of potentially preventable ED visits (PPEDs), particularly considering novel cancer therapies. It also uses machine learning (ML) to create early models to predict patients at highest risk of PPEDs. Methods: A retrospective study of ED visits by oncology patients between April 1st, 2019 and April 1st, 2021 at a single academic institution was completed. PPEDs were defined as ED visits resulting in discharge from the ED or an admission of less than 48 hours. PPEDs versus non-PPEDs were evaluated using descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and machine learning (ML) modelling. Results: 17% of cancer patients (n=6,689) had 13,415 ED visits during the study period. PPEDs differed in characteristics from non-PPEDs. Stage 1-3 patients with breast cancer, and those on IV systemic therapy were more likely to have PPEDs.Logistic regression models of pre-ED visit variables showed that stage, distance, and neoadjuvant systemic therapy were associated with PPEDs. Logistic regression of ED visit-related variables revealed that genitourinary, eye, or skin-related diagnoses were associated with PPEDs. The highest-performing ML model scored an AUC of 0.819, and combined pre-ED visit and ED visit related variables; stage 1-3 breast cancer patients, all IV chemotherapy patients, and stage 4 patients living within 15km of the ED, or with GI, oral or female gynecologic cancers were associated with PPEDs. ED diagnoses of “cancer” and MSK issues were associated with PPEDs. For those patients on IV systemic therapy specifically, having breast cancer, having a palliative consult within 60 days of the ED visit, or presenting with ED diagnoses of toxicities from therapy or blood disorders, pain, or rash were associated with PPEDs. Conclusions: Our novel definition of PPEDs versus non-PPEDs appears reasonable, and using machine learning has helped to describe groups of patients at highest likelihood of such visits at our institution. Future work to validate and advance these models into clinical prediction tools and algorithms could help proactively target high risk patients, and ideally decrease preventable ED visits in oncology.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science,Cost, Value, and Policy,Patient Experience,Survivorship

Sub Track

Quality Improvement Research and Implementation Science

Citation

JCO Oncol Pract 19, 2023 (suppl 11; abstr 463)

DOI

10.1200/OP.2023.19.11_suppl.463

Abstract #

463

Poster Bd #

K21

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Cecilia Mastrogiacomo

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Trends in breast cancer death by stage at diagnoses in 2000-2018.

First Author: Adriana Matutino Kahn

First Author: Amir Alishahi Tabriz

First Author: June Evelyn Jeon