Care utilization and satisfaction among patients with cancer with neutropenic fever managed by a remote patient monitoring (RPM) program.

Authors

null

Joshua Pritchett

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Joshua Pritchett, Jonas Paludo, Robert Haemmerle, Qian Shi, Nandita Khera, Zachary Yetmar, John W. Wilson, Rozalina McCoy, Angela Leuenberger, Sarah Phillips, Dominick Pahl, Sara M. Kloft-Nelson, Lindsey R. Sangaralingham, Alexander J. Ryu, David Phelan, Naseema Gangat, Julian R. Molina, Jon Charles Tilburt, Bijan J. Borah, Tufia C. Haddad

Organizations

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Department of Quantitative Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: The DEFeNDR (Decreasing the burden of Febrile Neutropenia through Dynamic RPM) program leverages in-home technology and centralized nurse monitoring to facilitate ambulatory management as an alternative to hospital-based care for cancer patients with neutropenic fever (NF). The objective of this study is to assess 30-day care utilization outcomes and patient satisfaction at 12 months after program implementation. Methods: Adult cancer patients hospitalized with NF were assessed daily for DEFeNDR program eligibility including MASCC score ≥21 (per ASCO guidelines) and no cellular therapy (CAR-T, BMT) in the prior 100 days. Patients agreeing to participate in the 30-day program received a cellular-enabled tablet with pre-connected devices for twice-daily vital signs and symptom assessments. Patient generated data were EHR-integrated in real-time. Embedded decision trees facilitated alerts for adverse trends. Virtual RPM nurses responded to alerts and utilized predefined care pathways. The primary endpoint was the mean proportion of evaluable days spent inpatient (mPEDI) within 30 days of eligibility comparing those who participated in the program (RPM) with those who declined (no RPM). Results: Of 85 eligible patients, 62 were offered DEFeNDR participation. Of those, 34 (54.8%) participated and 28 (45.2%) declined. Baseline characteristics and care utilization outcomes are summarized in Table 1. RPM patients experienced significantly lower mPEDI compared with unmonitored patients [5.1% (Standard Error [SE], 1.9%) vs 12.4% (SE, 2.1%); Wilcoxon Rank Sums p-value, 0.032]. RPM patients also experienced a trend toward fewer total hospital days and lower 30-day readmission rate, as well as shorter mean length of stay and lower rate of ICU utilization when readmitted. Non-visit care activities (EHR clinical communications, documentation, and patient messaging) were decreased from pre-hospital baseline for 58.8% of RPM patients versus 46.6% of those unmonitored. All RPM patients completing a patient satisfaction survey (n=9) indicated that they would recommend the program to patients with a similar condition. Conclusions: Cancer patients with NF participating in the DEFeNDR program experienced a significant reduction in mPEDI and care utilization compared with those who declined. Further studies are warranted to assess comparative effectiveness of this model vs usual care.

Baseline CharacteristicsRPMno RPM30-Day Care UtilizationRPMno RPMP-value
n3428mPEDI5.1%12.4%0.032
Median Age, years (range)63 (24-83)60 (25-83)Mean inpatient days1.43.30.053
% Female38%39%Readmission rate29.4%42.9%0.271
Median MASCC score at admission (range)21 (13-26)20 (11-26)Readmission: mean length of stay3.46.00.264
% with antibiotics continued at discharge61.8%57.1%Readmission: ICU utilization rate10%33%0.323

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Palliative and Supportive Care

Sub Track

Tools for Management of Treatment and Adverse Effects

Citation

JCO Oncol Pract 19, 2023 (suppl 11; abstr 572)

DOI

10.1200/OP.2023.19.11_suppl.572

Abstract #

572

Poster Bd #

M19

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Joshua Pritchett

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Remote patient monitoring (RPM) through smartphone application in community oncology practice.

First Author: Rayna Kuthiala

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Remote patient monitoring for high-risk oncology patients: A feasibility implementation study.

First Author: AnnMarie Mazzella Ebstein

First Author: Jordan Villars