Outcomes of clinical pharmacist integration in a community oncology practice.

Authors

null

Katie Sias

MyMichigan Health, Midland, MI

Katie Sias, David Reyes-Gastelum, Katie Young, Karen B. Farris, Ashley Schwartz, Julie Wietzke, Emily R. Mackler

Organizations

MyMichigan Health, Midland, MI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Michigan Institute for Care Management and Transformation (MICMT), Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, MI, Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium and Michigan Institute for Care Management and Transformation, Ann Arbor, MI

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: There is a need to optimize the education and follow-up of patients receiving oral anticancer agents (OAAs) and high emetic risk chemotherapy (HEC) due to toxicities and implications of non-adherence and decreased dose intensity. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes before and after the integration of a clinical pharmacist in a community oncology practice. Prior to the pharmacist, patients receiving OAAs and intravenous (IV) HEC received education and symptom monitoring by a team of nurses. Methods: This single center, retrospective analysis was conducted with data from February 2020 – December 2022. Up to 200 patients in the pre- and post-intervention periods each were identified. Charts were eligible for abstraction if patients were newly prescribed an OAA or IV HEC regimen during the study period. The post-intervention period began after the pharmacist’s start in March 2021. Patients receiving endocrine therapy for breast cancer were excluded. The following data were abstracted: patient demographics, OAA and IV HEC medication, line of therapy, cancer diagnosis, prescribed date, start date, education date, follow-up visits, emergency department (ED) and hospitalizations, reason for ED/hospitalization, IV HEC dose adjustments, delays and discontinuations. Chi-square analyses compared pre and post time periods. Results: Abstraction was completed for 179 patients in the pre-intervention (n=61 IV HEC; n=118 OAA) and 162 patients in the post-intervention group (n=44 IV HEC; n=118 OAA). After the pharmacist was integrated into the practice, more patients in the OAA group received education prior to their OAA start and had their medication adherence assessed. In the IV HEC group, more patients received guideline concordant care with a 4-drug regimen (including olanzapine) and were more often able to remain on their prescribed dose and dosing interval in the group with pharmacist care. Other outcomes remained approximately the same across time periods. Conclusions: Embedded clinical pharmacist care improved patient outcomes, including improved rates of patient education, medication adherence assessment, and improved dose intensity.

IV HEC -pre (n=61)IV HEC – post (n=44)OAA - pre (n=118)OAA - post (n=118)P-value
Education prior to start53 (87%)40 (91%)45 (41%)*100 (85%)*p=0.52
*p<0.0001
Medication adherence assessed------34 (29%)75 (64%)p<0.0001
Received guideline concordant antiemetics (4-drug regimen)13 (21%)27 (61%)------p<0.0001
90-day dose modifications/holds 38 (62%)18 (41%)------p=0.03
90-day dose discontinuations14 (25%)7 (18%)------p=0.43
90-day ED visits 13 (22%)9 (21%)18 (15%)*19 (16%)*p=0.93
*p=0.86
90-day hospitalizations20 (33%)13 (30%)21 (18%)*25 (21%)*p=0.72
*p=0.51

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science,Cost, Value, and Policy,Patient Experience,Survivorship

Sub Track

Team-Based Approaches to Care Delivery

Citation

JCO Oncol Pract 19, 2023 (suppl 11; abstr 61)

DOI

10.1200/OP.2023.19.11_suppl.61

Abstract #

61

Poster Bd #

C14

Abstract Disclosures