Symptom alert by type and severity among cancer patients using electronic patient reported outcomes for remote symptom monitoring.

Authors

null

Carrie C McNair

University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute, Mobile, AL

Carrie C McNair, Chelsea McGowen, Nicole E. Caston, Sheila McElhany, Bryanna Diaz, Naden Kreitz, Jeffrey Franks, Courtney J. Andrews, Chao-Hui Sylvia Huang, James Nicholas Odom, Bryan J. Weiner, Bradford E. Jackson, Ethan Basch, Angela M. Stover, Doris Howell, Gabrielle Betty Rocque, Jennifer Young Pierce

Organizations

University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute, Mobile, AL, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health
U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: Remote symptom monitoring (RSM) by electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) data can elicit actionable symptoms from patients with cancer. However, patients with different cancer diagnoses are likely to have differing symptom profiles and variability in symptom alerts. To understand potential workflow needs, this analysis was conducted to determine which types of symptoms and severity of alerts can be expected based on cancer type. Methods: Cancer patients initiating chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy at 2 academic cancer centers in Alabama, UAB O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center and USA Health Mitchell Cancer Institute (MCI), were enrolled in ePRO-based RSM. Site rollouts were differential: UAB enrolled by disease group starting May 2021, MCI by provider starting July 2021. Patients received weekly symptom surveys of selected PRO-CTCAE questions through the Carevive ePRO mobile platform (PROmpt), triggering alerts to clinical teams if reported symptoms were determined to be moderate or severe. Demographics, cancer diagnosis, and ePRO data were extracted from electronic health records and Carevive. Descriptive statistics of categorical variables were calculated by frequencies and percentages; Cramer’s V and Cohen’s d were used for associations and effect size. Results: UAB enrolled 598 patients and MCI enrolled 274 patients by April 2023, consistent with the patient volume difference of the centers. 68% of enrollees were White; MCI saw a moderately higher % of Black patients (V: 0.21). 67% of enrolled patients were female. Median age was 61 years (Interquartile range: 51-69); UAB patients were slightly younger (d: 0.15). Among 872 enrolled patients, 9765 symptom alerts were generated. There was a small effect of cancer type on the overall type of symptoms and symptom severity reported (V: 0.11 and 0.09 respectively). Of the total number of symptom alerts, 28.0% of the alerts generated were for pain, followed by nausea/vomiting (14.9%), and constipation (11.7%). When broken down by cancer type, pain was the symptom most frequently reported for each type. The next most frequently reported symptoms differed but were as expected by cancer type: coughing/dyspnea by lung cancer patients (20.6%); urinary complaints in genitourinary cancers (14.1%); and nausea/vomiting in gastrointestinal cancers (18.0%). The frequency of moderate alerts was 62.1%, varying from 34.0% in sarcoma to 66.6% in gastrointestinal cancers. 31.1% of the alerts were severe; sarcoma had the most severe alerts (56.0%) and hematologic had the least (27.1%). Conclusions: Across patients with differing cancer types, pain and gastrointestinal issues were over half the reported symptoms. However, variability by cancer diagnosis in both symptom type and severity was observed, suggesting the remote symptom management workload for providers may vary by cancer type.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A

Track

Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science,Cost, Value, and Policy,Patient Experience,Survivorship

Sub Track

Integrating Patient Experience Assessment and Patient Reported Outcomes Into Practice

Citation

JCO Oncol Pract 19, 2023 (suppl 11; abstr 340)

DOI

10.1200/OP.2023.19.11_suppl.340

Abstract #

340

Poster Bd #

E25

Abstract Disclosures