The impact of 4R Care Delivery Model on timing and sequence of bone density screening among patients with breast cancer.

Authors

null

Carolyn Brookhart

Kaiser San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

Carolyn Brookhart, Christine B. Weldon, Julia R. Trosman, Zheng Zhu, Elizabeth Shurell Linehan, Amy Ying Ju Lin, Thea Abbe, Lori C. Sakoda, Nancy P. Gordon, Arliene Ravelo, Aida Shirazi, Marilyn L. Kwan, Raymond Liu

Organizations

Kaiser San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, Center for Business Models in Healthcare, Glencoe, IL, Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA, Kaiser, San Francisco, CA, Department of Hematology Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, Walnut Creek, CA, Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, Department of Medical Oncology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Genentech

Background: Bone loss is common in patients with breast cancer and can impact treatment decisions related to endocrine therapy. Hence, bone density assessment prior to starting endocrine therapy is highly important, especially because endocrine therapy is the first line adjuvant treatment for patients with ER+ breast cancer. Implementing timely bone density assessment is challenging, particularly in the early care trajectory when there are many tests and procedures taking place. We conducted a care delivery optimization in a large health system to implement bone density testing and referral for bone health consultation prior to endocrine therapy. The optimization was conducted as part of implementing the 4R Oncology model (Right Info, Right Care, Right Patient, at the Right Time), a novel approach to improving patient-facing care planning, team-based delivery and patient self-management. Here we describe the impact of this intervention. Methods: A cohort of 278 women with breast cancer who were in the 4R intervention (the 4R cohort) was compared to a historical control cohort of 201 women who received care pre-4R. Demographic, bone health history, and oncologic care data were abstracted from chart review and clinical databases. The prevalence of bone loss and timing of bone density consultation request was compared between the 4R and historical control cohorts. Results: The age, race/ethnicity and rate of ER+ cancer were similar between cohorts. Patients in the 4R cohort were significantly more likely to have received a consultation for bone density screening prior to the start of endocrine therapy (see Table). They were also more likely to receive a bone density test result during their care (Table). These findings remained significant when data were restricted to those ≥ 50 years (as a proxy for postmenopausal status) and those with ER-positive breast cancer. The rates of osteopenia and osteoporosis were similar between the cohorts: control 47%, 24%; 4R cohort: 46%, 23% respectively (data not shown). Conclusions: Care optimization using the 4R Oncology Model was associated with a significant improvement in the timing of bone density testing before initiation of endocrine therapy. The 4R Oncology Model can lead to more informed decision making in adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with breast cancer. Additional optimizations to improve the rates of bone density tests and referrals will be beneficial.

All patients, Historical cohort %, N = 278All patients, 4R cohort %, N = 20150+ yo, control cohort %, n = 14750+ yo, 4R cohort %, n = 212ER+ control cohort %, n = 180ER+ 4R cohort %, n = 244
Patients with bone density test results7482*5668*5264*
Patients referred to bone density consult prior to endocrine therapy3246*4051*3652*

*Statistically significant compared to control, p < 0.05

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Palliative and Supportive Care

Sub Track

Tools for Care Coordination

Citation

JCO Oncol Pract 19, 2023 (suppl 11; abstr 553)

DOI

10.1200/OP.2023.19.11_suppl.553

Abstract #

553

Poster Bd #

L28

Abstract Disclosures