Association of health insurance coverage disruptions and breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer screening.

Authors

null

Kewei Sylvia Shi

American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA

Kewei Sylvia Shi, Jessica Star, Jingxuan Zhao, Xuesong Han, Robin Yabroff

Organizations

American Cancer Society, Kennesaw, GA, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Health insurance coverage is critical for ensuring access to recommended health care in the United States. This study investigates the effects of insurance coverage disruptions on receipt of breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer screenings. Methods: We identified adults <65 years eligible for breast, cervical and/or colorectal cancer screening from the 2015, 2019, and 2021 National Health Interview Survey (years cancer control supplements fielded). Adults were categorized into 5 groups based on insurance type at survey and prior coverage disruptions (lack of insurance during prior 12 months): private, with and without disruption; public, with and without disruption; and uninsured. Screening outcomes included: 1) past-year screening and 2) guideline-concordant screening, defined from the US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines available at the time of each survey. Separate multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations of insurance coverage disruptions and cancer screening. Results: We identified 12,121 women aged 50-64 years eligible for breast cancer screening, 23,490 people aged 50-64 years eligible for colorectal cancer screening, and 33,391 women aged 21-64 years eligible for cervical cancer screening. Compared to people with continuous private or public coverage, people with coverage disruptions were less likely to receive past-year or guideline-concordant cancer screening (Table). People without health insurance coverage had the lowest level of screening. Among people with private coverage, disruptions were associated with lower guideline-concordant screening across all three cancer types in adjusted analyses (breast: AOR: 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.32, 0.63); colorectal: 0.49 (0.39, 0.62); cervical: 0.70 (0.58,0.84)); among people with public coverage, disruptions were associated with lower guideline-concordant breast cancer screening (AOR: 0.39 (0.23, 0.65)). Conclusions: Health insurance coverage disruptions were associated with lower past-year and guideline-concordant breast, colorectal, and cervical cancer screening. Findings underscore the importance of stable health insurance coverage as part of a comprehensive approach to improve cancer screening rates and early detection of cancers when treatment is most effective.

Private Continuously InsuredPrivate With Prior DisruptionPublic Continuously InsuredPublic With Prior DisruptionUninsured
Past-year mammogram62.040.151.833.425.8
Breast guideline-concordant80.262.670.948.041.9
Past-year colonoscopy14.89.615.68.64.0
Past-year home-based stool test6.97.27.78.74.3
Colorectal guideline-concordant66.645.453.846.328.3
Past-year pap smear/HPV48.342.243.344.328.4
Cervical guideline-concordant76.969.067.369.155.5

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B

Track

Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Palliative and Supportive Care

Sub Track

Access to Timely Detection and Referral

Citation

JCO Oncol Pract 19, 2023 (suppl 11; abstr 116)

DOI

10.1200/OP.2023.19.11_suppl.116

Abstract #

116

Poster Bd #

B23

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Ali Rashed Kazmi

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

The COVID-19 pandemic's impact on diagnosis of cancers detectable through screening.

First Author: Carmen Guerra

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Rates of routine cancer screening compared with pre-pandemic levels.

First Author: Allison H Oakes