Glioblastoma in elderly patients: A retrospective analysis of survival and response based on molecular and clinical characteristics—Experience in our centre.

Authors

null

Estibaliz Iza

Department of Medical Oncology. Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain

Estibaliz Iza , Joan Manel Mañe , Eluska Iruarrizaga , Itziar Rubio , Ricardo Fernandez , Pablo Jiménez , Failah Mohamed Lamin , Mikel Toquero , Alberto Muñoz

Organizations

Department of Medical Oncology. Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain, Hospital Universitario De Cruces, Barakaldo, Spain, IMQ Zorrotzaurre, Bilbao, Spain, Deparment of Medical Oncology. Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Spain

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most lethal and the most common malignant central nervous system tumor in adults. The standard treatment includes surgery, radiotherapy (Rt) and temozolomide based chemotherapy (Qt). However, compared with younger population, overall survival (OS) is worse in elderly patients and, additionally, this group is not usually included in clinical trials. Retrospective studies have shown, among other factors, tumor biology and performance status with poorer survival in older population, but it is necessary further research in order to discover prognostic factors and optimize management in this group. Methods: In this retrospective study we analyzed clinical and tumor biology characteristics in older population (≥ 70 years) and we also compared these results with younger population (< 70 years) for the purpose of enhance clinical outcomes. From November-2016 to October-2022, we analyzed 111 patients in our hospital: group A (< 70 years): 80 patients, group B (≥ 70 years): 31 patients. The tumor biology and patient characteristics are described in the table. Results: OS was statistically better in group A (A 13.93 +/- 1.28 months versus B 9.39 +/- 1.45 months; p=0.035). In contrast of A, in B no differences in OS were observed related with type of surgery (p=0.78), MGMT status (p=0.4) or p53 status (p=0.75). However, significant differences in OS were observed in B in multivariate analysis according to modality of adjuvant treatment (greater OS in Qt-Rt+ Qt > Qt-Rt > Rt exclusively > no treatment; p<0.001) and performance status (greater OS in PS 0 > PS 1 > PS 2 > PS 3; p=0.001). There was no differences of OS between A and B if the adjuvant treatment was concomitant Qt-Rt +/- Qt (p=0.81), but with this therapy there was a toxic death (infection Grade 5) in B group. Other relevant toxicities Grade 3/4 in this group with Qt-Rt +/-Qt were: infection 3.2%, thrombocytopenia 12.9%, neutropenia 12.9%, leukopenia 6.45%, anemia 3.2%, thrombosis 3.2% Conclusions: Temozolomide based therapy is an effective and safe option for the treatment of patients ≥ 70 years with GBM. We need to perform prospective trials in this population in order to recognize prognostic and predictive factors to allow better treatment selection.

≥ 70 years (%)< 70 years (%)
Gender: Male/Female54.8 / 45.263.8 / 36.3
Surgery: R0/ R2/ biopsy19.4/ 51.6/ 2921.3/ 43.8/ 35
MGMT: methylated/ not methylated/ low-moderate methylated/not realized)48.4 / 45.2 / 6.5/ 051.3 / 41.3 / 2.5/ 5
TERT: mutated/not mutated/not realized)19.4/ 3.2 / 77.427.5 / 6.3 / 66.3
ATRX: positive/negative/not realized)93.5 / 3.2/ 3.276.3/ 15 / 8.8
p53: positive/negative25.8/74.232.9/67.1
Modality of adjuvant Treatment: Qt-Rt and adjuvant Qt/ Qt-Rt/ Rt exclusively/ No treatment35.5/19.4/19.4/25.857.5/23.8/6.3/12.3
Performance Status: 0/1/2/3/40/56.5/26.1/17.4/010/64.3/20/5.7/0

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Primary CNS Tumors–Glioma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e14054)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e14054

Abstract #

e14054

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Emilie Le Rhun

First Author: Donna Molaie

First Author: Maria Angeles Vaz