Study of practice patterns in NGS vs single gene testing, provider-identified barriers to biomarker testing and utilization of liquid biopsy across multiple hospital-based cancer centers.

Authors

null

Lijo Simpson

Atlanta Cancer Care, Decatur, GA

Lijo Simpson , Anju Mathew , Jeremy Stapp

Organizations

Atlanta Cancer Care, Decatur, GA, OncoLens, Tucker, GA, OncoLens, Atlanta, GA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Bayer

Background: Limited data exists on next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing rates, utilization of single gene tests for therapy matching, use of liquid biopsies in therapy selection, or physician-perceived barriers to testing in hospital-based cancer centers. Initial project goal is to establish a baseline for such metrics. Methods: 700 patient records of various solid tumor types were assessed as part of a quality improvement project at three different cancer centers over a six-month period: 1) a regional IDN, 2) an NCI center, and 3) a community cancer center/affiliate of an NCI center. This was combined with qualitative surveys on current state practices and barriers to NGS testing completed by thirty (30) respondents from these institutions (97% physicians, 3% nonphysicians). Site specific Physician champions were recruited to identify additional interventions to be implemented at their respective site(s). Results: Baseline findings show 45% of advanced cancers received any biomarker tissue testing, with testing rates of 53%, 25%, and 66% in lung, pancreas, and colon cancers, respectively. Broad-based panel testing made up 59% of tests, and 31% of patients continue to receive single gene testing only. Approximately one third of patients who developed recurrent disease had biomarker testing (38%) compared to patients with an initial diagnosis of advanced cancer where more than half received testing (51%). Use of liquid biopsies was limited, representing 4% of biomarker testing, but 71% of the time it was incremental to completed tissue testing. Three types of testing barriers were identified by survey respondents: 1) 63% cited limited quantity of tissue available, 2) 53% cited reimbursement concerns including “potential cost to patient,” and 3) 44% cited cumbersome process due to delays and long turnaround times for authorization, ordering, and/or delivery of results. Conclusions: 1) A lower number of patients with disease recurrence are obtaining broad panel NGS compared to patients with de novo metastatic disease; 2) There continues to be low utilization of liquid biopsies for patients with advanced cancers; and 3) Single gene tests continue to be used for therapy matching in a large number of patients with advanced cancers. Improving testing rates including use of broad panel tests and liquid biopsies appropriately will require ongoing education and/or automated reminders to cancer care teams. Further education needs to focus on reimbursement concerns at an institutional level and on testing patients who recur after initial cancer diagnosis and therapy.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Quality Improvement

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e18743)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e18743

Abstract #

e18743

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Comparison between liquid biopsy and tissue NGS in two cohorts of advanced NSCLC.

First Author: Helena Bote

First Author: Nikki A. Martin

First Author: Krishna Desai

First Author: Marco Galvez-Nino