“Interchangeability” of anti-PD1 antibodies in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (mM).

Authors

null

Darya Kravchuk

Moskovskii Mnogoprofilnyi Klinicheskii Tcentr "Kommunarka" Departamenta Zdravoohraneniia Goroda Moskvy, Moscow, Russian Federation

Darya Kravchuk , Mikhail Fedyanin , Anastasia Rays , Fedor Vladimirovich Moiseenko , Kirill Ivanilov , Vladimir Popov , Elena Glazkova , Viacheslav Chubenko , Evgeny Levchenko , Nikita Volkov

Organizations

Moskovskii Mnogoprofilnyi Klinicheskii Tcentr "Kommunarka" Departamenta Zdravoohraneniia Goroda Moskvy, Moscow, Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (N.N. Blokhin NMRCO), Moscow, Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution «N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russian Federation, N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, Kommunarka Moscow City Clinical Center, Moscow, Russian Federation, N. N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Centre, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation, St. Petersburg Clinical and Research Center of Specialized Types of Oncological Medical Care, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, Saint-Petersburg Scientific Practical Center of Specialized Kinds of Medical Care (Oncological), Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: PD-L1 inhibitors are the components of the standard treatment options in pts with mM. Currently, there are no data about the efficacy and safety of switching the between of different anti-PD1 antibodies in pts with mM, therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of interchangeability of nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and prolgolimab in such population. Methods: We performed a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of pts with advanced cutaneous melanoma. Inclusion criteria were as follows: histologically confirmed cutaneous melanoma, performance status ECOG 0-2, and first-line treatment with anti-PD1 antibody and switching to another anti-PD1 antibody due to economic issues with no progressive disease after initiating of immunotherapy. Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS), secondary end-points were rate of all grades and grade 3-4 adverse events (CTC AE 5.0). A sample size of 87 achieves 80% power to detect an equivalence difference of 15% in 3-months PFS after change of anti-PD1 antibody using a one-sided exact test with a significance level (alpha) of 0,05. These results assume a baseline proportion of 3-months PFS 0,6 and that the actual difference is 0. Results: A total of 92 patients (52% female) were included with the median age of 65 year (28-95). Number of organs with metastases 1, 2, ≥3 were in 62 (67%), 19 (21%), and 11 (12%) of pts, respectively. Liver metastases were observed in 11% of patients. Performance status ECOG 0, 1, and 2 was in 31 (34%), 58 (63%), 3 (3,2%) pts, respectively. 56 (61%) pts received nivolumab, 18 (20%) patients received pembrolizumab, 16 (17%) patients received prolgolimab, and 2 (2%) patients received atezolizumab as first-line treatment. 19 (20,6%) pts were switched to nivolumab, 18 (19,5%) pts were switched to pembrolizumab, 57 (61,9%) pts were switched to prolgolimab, and 2 (2,1%) - to atezolizumab during first-line treatment. The median duration of treatment with first anti-PD1 antibody was 8,5 months (range 1-58 months), with second PD1-inhibitor was 4,2 months (range 1-19 months), with third anti-PD1 antibody – 2,8 months (range 1-10 months). 58 (63%) patients received 2 drugs and 34 (36%) patients received 3 drugs. Within 3 months after 1 replacement of the drug, there were 82 (89.1%) pts without progression. The efficacy was not associated with type of the switched antibodies. The frequency of all AEs and AEs is 3-4. on the first drug was 16.3% and 1.1%, when switching to the second drug - 10.8% and 0%, when switching to the third drug 3.2% and 0%. Conclusions: Our data indicate that it is possible to switch from one anti-PD1 antibody to another in first-line therapy in pts with mM without progression when limited access to anti-PD1 antibodies exists. Further randomized studies are needed to determine the efficacy of such switching strategy of ICIs.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e21546)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e21546

Abstract #

e21546

Abstract Disclosures