Real-world experience with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in the management of non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to first-line systemic therapy: Review of literature.

Authors

null

Vishal Devarkonda

Feist-Weiller Cancer Center at LSUHSC-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA

Vishal Devarkonda , Laxman Yashwant Byreddi , Shravya Balmuri , Thulasi Gudi , Shiva Jashwanth Gaddam , Dinesh Keerty

Organizations

Feist-Weiller Cancer Center at LSUHSC-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, LSU Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, Ochsner LSU Health, Shreveport, LA, Merit health, Vicksburg, MS, LSUHSC-S, Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Shreveport, LA

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the third leading cause of cancer-associated deaths. In 2020, the positive results of the IMbrave 150 trial and FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approval subsequently revolutionized the management of non-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma as the first-line treatment. However, their role as second-line therapy in people refractory to systemic therapy needs to be better studied. We perform a comprehensive literature review evaluating outcomes of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients refractory to first-line systemic therapy. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, evaluating the outcomes of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients refractory to first-line systemic therapy. Results:Conclusions: Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab is Safe and effective in the patient’s refractory to prior systemic therapy. However, when used as a second-line therapy, patients tend to have lower Median Odds of survival and Median progression-free survival. The outcome also changes with the type of prior systemic chemotherapy, with initial hyper-progression reported with prior therapy with lenvatinib. The AFP response at six weeks could be a predictive indicator of disease progression.

Review of the studies reported in the literature.
Study and yearDesignPts (Patients) refractory to prior systemic therapyFollow response as per RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors)AE (Adverse effects)
Kuzuya et al 21Retrospective and nonrandomized single-center study16 Pts refractory to Lenvatinib6 weeks follow-up showed no cases with CR (Complete response), two PR (partial response), 10 SD (Stable disease) and four PD (progressive disease)Grade 3AEs at 6 weeks was 13.0%.
Tiago De Castro et al 21Retrospective case series46 Pts with prior systemic therapy (29 more than 1 line and 17 more than 2 lines of systemic therapyMedian follow up at 4.4 months mOS 6 months (95% CI: 3.2–8.9; p<0.001)], mPFS 3.7months (95% CI: 2.7–4.7); p<0.001], CR:0, PD: 30.1%, SD: 27.4%Bleeding complication 13.7 %, Worsening liver function 53.4 %
Hayakawa et al 22Single center retrospective study29 Pts received more than 1-line systemic therapyMedian follow up at 221 days showed
2 PR, 1 SD, and 12 PD
Transaminase increase (5.8%)
Sugimoto et al 22Prospective observational study31 Pts median received 2 to 6 lines of systemic therapy. Immediate prior treatment was Lenvatinib in 20 patients, sorafenib in 2, regorafenib in 3, and ramucirumab in 6.Follow up at 9 weeks 4 PR, 16 PD, 10 PDProteinuria (22.5%), AST increase (16%), Stevens-Johnson-syndrome (3.2%)

PR: Partial response, SR: Sustain response, CR: Complete response, PD: Progressive disease, mOS: median overall survival, mPFS: median Progression free survival.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer - Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e16189)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e16189

Abstract #

e16189

Abstract Disclosures