Ovarian cancer and bevacizumab: Real-world use across western countries and effect on survival in high-risk subgroups.

Authors

null

Kristina Lindemann

Department of gynecological oncology, Radiumhospital, Oslo University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Kristina Lindemann , Miguel Abreu , Maria de Lurdes Batarda , Dorry Boll , Anne Weng Ekmann-Gade , Jesper Hansen , Ala Jabri Haug , Claus Høgdall , Jacob Korach , Els Van Nieuwenhuysen , P. B. Ottevanger , Stephan Polterauer , Tine Henrichsen Schnack , Trude Agesen , Sofia Waldemarson , Klaus Kaae Andersen , Christian Marth

Organizations

Department of gynecological oncology, Radiumhospital, Oslo University Hospital & Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Oslo, Norway, Portuguese Institute of Oncology - Porto, Porto, Portugal, Champalimaud Foundation (Fundação Champalimaud), Lisbon, Portugal, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands, Department of Gynecology, Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, AstraZeneca, C, Denmark, Department of Gynecological Cancer, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet & Department of gynecology and obstetrics, Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan and Israeli Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ISGO), Tel Hashomer, Israel, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands, Comp Cancer Ctr Vienna, Wien, Austria, Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Odense, Odense, Denmark, AstraZeneca, Oslo, Norway, AstraZeneca, Stockholm, Sweden, Omicron, Copenhagen, Denmark, Innsbruck Medical University; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck, Austria

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
AstraZeneca, part of an alliance between AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc (Kenilworth, New Jersey)

Background: Bevacizumab (bev) may be part of first-line treatment for patients with “high-risk” epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) (GOG-0218 and ICON7 trials). The prevalence of high-risk patient subgroups, including bev use and its effect on survival in a real-world setting is not well studied. Methods: The observational multi-country cohort study RESPONSE collected retrospectively medical record data on women with newly diagnosed advanced high-grade serous or endometrioid OC (DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34350). We analysed patients defined as ‘high-risk’ according to ICON7 definition as either 1) stage IV disease, 2) inoperable stage III disease or 3) sub-optimally debulked (>1 cm residual disease) stage III disease. Unadjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to estimate the association of bev with the risk of death. Follow up time was calculated from time between response assessment at the end of primary chemotherapy and death or 20 months follow-up, whichever occurred first. Results: Of 954 patients in total, we identified 386 high-risk patients (40%) treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Of these, 132 (34%) received bev maintenance treatment. Baseline characteristics did not differ between patients receiving bev or no bev. Bev use was associated with a statistically significant reduction in risk of death with a HR of 0.49 (95%Ci: 0.18-0.78, p=0.002) in the total group of high-risk patients. The effect on survival was most evident among inoperable stage III/IV patients (n=151) with a 63% reduction in risk of death (HR 0.37; 95% CI (0.18-0.78, p=0.009). Risk estimates for additional subgroups are given in the table. Conclusions: Forty percent of this real-world population are considered high-risk according to ICON-7 and a majority of these patients did not receive bev during first-line treatment. In line with ICON 7, this analysis supports the beneficial effect of bev on overall survival in this high-risk population. Patients who do not receive surgery are underrepresented in clinical trials and this real-world study confirms the strong benefit of bev particularly in this subgroup. Any real-world study may be limited by the potential presence of selection bias of patients to receive bevacizumab or not.

Effect estimates on overall survival in patients receiving platinumbased chemotherapy with or without bev.

Analysis setChemotherapy with
bevacizumab (no. of pts)
Chemotherapy without
bevacizumab (no. of pts)
Events NHR
95% CI
p-value
High-risk*1322541020.49
(0.31-0.77)
0.002
Inoperable (stage
III/IV)
34117620.37
(0.18-0.78)
0.009
Stage IV89150560.50
(0.28-0.91)
0.023
Stage III inoperable1568280.33
(0.10-1.10)
0.069
Stage III >1cm residual2836180.63
(0.25-1.6)
0.324

*High-risk patients included stage IV disease, inoperable stage III disease or sub-optimally debulked (>1 cm) stage III disease

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 5587)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.5587

Abstract #

5587

Poster Bd #

282

Abstract Disclosures