Maintenance therapy with a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARP) in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors

null

Carlos Stecca

Centro de Oncologia do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil

Carlos Stecca , Maysa Vilbert , Isabella Michelon , Caio Castro , Maria Inez Dacoregio , Fabio Fin , Audrey Tieko Tsunoda , Andreia Cristina De Melo , Alexandre Andre B. A. Da Costa

Organizations

Centro de Oncologia do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada, Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil, Universidade de Brasília, Brasilia, Brazil, UNICENTRO, Guarapuava, Brazil, Erasto Gaertner Hospital, Curitiba, Brazil, Nacional Cancer Institute, Brazil, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Cambridge, MA

Research Funding

No funding received
None.

Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been approved for maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients with or without homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). In this meta-analysis, the latest clinical data to assess the efficacy and safety of this approach across different subgroups were synthesized. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared maintenance PARPi with placebo in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. The outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS) according to HRD status, overall survival (OS), second PFS (PFS2), and time-to-first subsequent treatment (TFST). Heterogeneity was examined with I2 statistics. A random-effects model was used for outcomes with high heterogeneity. Results: A total of 6 Randomized clinical trials with 3609 patients were included, of whom 2348 (65%) received maintenance PARPi. PFS was significantly longer for HRD-positive patients receiving PARPi [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.44, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.37 – 0.52 p<0.001] and for HRD-negative patients [HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 – 0.92 p=0.009]. Maintenance PARPi was associated with improved OS in HRD-positive patients [HR 0.59, CI 0.47 -0.73, p<0.001] but not in unselected patients. PFS2 in the HRD-positive population was reported in three trials, and it favored the use of PARPi [HR 0.57, CI 0.43 – 0.76, p<0.001]. Adverse events ≥grade 3 were more common in patients on maintenance PARPi (p<0.001). The occurrence of myelodysplastic syndrome was numerically but not significantly higher in the PARPi group. Conclusions: Maintenance with PARPi in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer significantly prolongs PFS regardless of HRD status. Moreover, PARPi maintenance improves OS and PFS2 in patients with BRCA and/or HRD-positive tumors compared to placebo.

Baseline characteristics of included studies.

StudyN, PARPiN, ControlFIGO stage – n (%)BRCA mutation – n (%)HRD status – n (%)Median follow-up (months)
SOLO-1, 2018260, Olaparib131, PlaceboIII 325 (83.1)
IV 66 (16.9)
391 (100)NR84
PAOLA-1, 2019537, Olaparib269, BevacizumabIII 564 (70)
IV 242 (30)
241 (29.9)387 (48)61.7 (arm A)
61.9 (arm B)
PRIMA, 2019487, Niraparib246, PlaceboIII 476 (64.9)
IV 257 (35.1)
223 (30.4)373 (50.9)13.8
VELIA, 2019382, Veliparib throughout group
383, Veliparib combination only group
375, PlaceboIII 875 (76.8)
IV 263 (23.1)
Missing data 2 (0.1)
298 (26.1)627 (55)28
ATHENA (mono), 2022427, Rucaparib111, PlaceboIII 568 (73.5)
III 204 (26.5)
115 (21.4)234 (43.5)26.1
PRIME§, 2022255, Niraparib129, PlaceboIII 276 (71.9)
IV 108 (28.1)
125 (32.5)257 (66.9)27.5

§conference abstract; N: number of patients; NR: Non reported; FIGO: The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; BRCA: BReast CAncer gene; HRD: homologous recombination deficiency.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e17587)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e17587

Abstract #

e17587

Abstract Disclosures