Centro de Oncologia do Parana, Curitiba, Brazil
Carlos Stecca , Maysa Vilbert , Isabella Michelon , Caio Castro , Maria Inez Dacoregio , Fabio Fin , Audrey Tieko Tsunoda , Andreia Cristina De Melo , Alexandre Andre B. A. Da Costa
Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been approved for maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients with or without homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). In this meta-analysis, the latest clinical data to assess the efficacy and safety of this approach across different subgroups were synthesized. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared maintenance PARPi with placebo in newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. The outcomes of interest included progression-free survival (PFS) according to HRD status, overall survival (OS), second PFS (PFS2), and time-to-first subsequent treatment (TFST). Heterogeneity was examined with I2 statistics. A random-effects model was used for outcomes with high heterogeneity. Results: A total of 6 Randomized clinical trials with 3609 patients were included, of whom 2348 (65%) received maintenance PARPi. PFS was significantly longer for HRD-positive patients receiving PARPi [Hazard ratio (HR) 0.44, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.37 – 0.52 p<0.001] and for HRD-negative patients [HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 – 0.92 p=0.009]. Maintenance PARPi was associated with improved OS in HRD-positive patients [HR 0.59, CI 0.47 -0.73, p<0.001] but not in unselected patients. PFS2 in the HRD-positive population was reported in three trials, and it favored the use of PARPi [HR 0.57, CI 0.43 – 0.76, p<0.001]. Adverse events ≥grade 3 were more common in patients on maintenance PARPi (p<0.001). The occurrence of myelodysplastic syndrome was numerically but not significantly higher in the PARPi group. Conclusions: Maintenance with PARPi in patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer significantly prolongs PFS regardless of HRD status. Moreover, PARPi maintenance improves OS and PFS2 in patients with BRCA and/or HRD-positive tumors compared to placebo.
Study | N, PARPi | N, Control | FIGO stage – n (%) | BRCA mutation – n (%) | HRD status – n (%) | Median follow-up (months) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOLO-1, 2018 | 260, Olaparib | 131, Placebo | III 325 (83.1) IV 66 (16.9) | 391 (100) | NR | 84 |
PAOLA-1, 2019 | 537, Olaparib | 269, Bevacizumab | III 564 (70) IV 242 (30) | 241 (29.9) | 387 (48) | 61.7 (arm A) 61.9 (arm B) |
PRIMA, 2019 | 487, Niraparib | 246, Placebo | III 476 (64.9) IV 257 (35.1) | 223 (30.4) | 373 (50.9) | 13.8 |
VELIA, 2019 | 382, Veliparib throughout group 383, Veliparib combination only group | 375, Placebo | III 875 (76.8) IV 263 (23.1) Missing data 2 (0.1) | 298 (26.1) | 627 (55) | 28 |
ATHENA (mono), 2022 | 427, Rucaparib | 111, Placebo | III 568 (73.5) III 204 (26.5) | 115 (21.4) | 234 (43.5) | 26.1 |
PRIME§, 2022 | 255, Niraparib | 129, Placebo | III 276 (71.9) IV 108 (28.1) | 125 (32.5) | 257 (66.9) | 27.5 |
§conference abstract; N: number of patients; NR: Non reported; FIGO: The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; BRCA: BReast CAncer gene; HRD: homologous recombination deficiency.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Muhammad Ali Khan
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Debra L. Richardson
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Hua Yuan
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Amos Stemmer