Phase III MIRASOL (GOG 3045/ENGOT-ov55) study: Initial report of mirvetuximab soravtansine vs. investigator's choice of chemotherapy in platinum-resistant, advanced high-grade epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancers with high folate receptor-alpha expression.

Authors

Kathleen Moore

Kathleen N. Moore

Stephenson Oklahoma Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK

Kathleen N. Moore , Antoine Angelergues , Gottfried E. Konecny , Susana N. Banerjee , Sandro Pignata , Nicoletta Colombo , John William Moroney , Casey Cosgrove , JUNG-YUN LEE , Andrzej Roszak , Jacqueline Maria Tromp , Diana Bello-Roufai , Lucy Gilbert , Rowan Miller , Tashanna K. N. Myers , Yuemei Wang , Anna Berkenblit , Domenica Lorusso , Toon Van Gorp

Organizations

Stephenson Oklahoma Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon, Paris, France, University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Santa Monica, CA, The National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy, University of Milan-Bicocca and European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, and MANGO, Milan, Italy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Wielkopolskie Centrum Onkologi, Poznan, Poland, Academical Medical Center, Amsterdam Zuidoost, Netherlands, Centre Rene Huguenin, Saint-Cloud, France, McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montréal, QC, Canada, University College Hospital-London, London, United Kingdom, Baystate Health, Springfield, MA, ImmunoGen, Inc, Waltham, MA, ImmunoGen Inc., Waltham, MA, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS and Catholic University of Sacred Heart, and MITO, Roma, Italy, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
ImmunoGen

Background: Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV), an antibody drug conjugate targeting FRα, demonstrated clinically meaningful antitumor activity in a single arm trial reported previously (Matulonis, JCO 2023). MIRASOL is a randomized phase 3 trial to confirm the efficacy of MIRV vs standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients (pts) with PROC. Methods: 453 PROC pts with high FRα expression (Roche FOLR1 Assay) with 1-3 priors were randomized 1:1 to MIRV 6 mg/kg, adjusted ideal body weight, Day 1 of a 21-day cycle or IC: paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator (INV) with key secondary endpoints ORR, overall survival (OS), and patient-reported outcomes in hierarchical order; other endpoints included safety and tolerability. Blinded independent central review (BICR) for PFS and ORR were sensitivity analyses. Results: With a data cutoff of March 6, 2023, 227 pts were randomized to the MIRV arm; 226 to the IC arm. Median follow-up was 13.1 months. Baseline characteristics were well balanced across arms; 14% of pts had one, 39% two, and 47% three prior lines of therapy; 62% received prior bev; and 55% received prior PARPi therapy. The study met its primary and key secondary endpoints with statistically significant results in PFS (INV), ORR (INV), and OS (Table). In the bev-pretreated subset (n=281), PFS HR was 0.64 (0.492, 0.842) and OS HR was 0.74 (0.535, 1.036); in the bev-naïve subset (n=172), PFS HR was 0.66 (0.459, 0.942) and OS HR was 0.51 (0.306, 0.860). The adverse event (AE) profile of MIRV was consistent with prior reports: predominantly low-grade ocular (MIRV vs IC all grade 56% vs 9%; grade 3+ 14% vs 0%) and gastrointestinal events (MIRV vs IC all grade 70% vs 66%; grade 3+ 13% vs 15%). Compared with IC, MIRV was associated with lower rates of grade 3+ treatment-emergent AEs (42% vs 54%), serious AEs (24% vs 33%), and discontinuations due to TEAEs (9% vs 16%). Fourteen percent of pts on the MIRV arm remained on study drug vs 3% on the IC arm. Conclusion: MIRV is the first treatment to demonstrate a PFS and OS benefit in PROC compared to IC. The efficacy data, along with the well-characterized safety profile, position MIRV as a new, standard of care for pts with FRα positive PROC. Clinical trial information: NCT04209855.

Efficacy EndpointsMIRV (n=227)IC (n=226)Hazard RatioP-value
mPFS (INV)
(months, 95% CI)
5.62
(4.34, 5.95)
3.98
(2.86, 4.47)
0.65
(0.52, 0.81)
<0.0001
mPFS (BICR)
(months, 95% CI)
5.91
(4.93, 6.97)
4.34
(3.52, 4.99)
0.72
(0.56, 0.92)
0.0082
ORR (INV)
(95% CI)
42.3
(35.8, 49.0)
15.9
(11.4, 21.4)
NA<0.0001
Complete response
% (n)
5.3 (12)0NANA
Partial response
% (n)
37.0 (84)15.9 (36)NANA
ORR (BICR)
(95% CI)
36.1
(29.9, 42.7)
14.6
(10.3, 19.9)
NA<0.0001
mOS
(months, 95% CI)
16.46
(14.46, 24.57)
12.75
(10.91, 14.36)
0.67
(0.50, 0.88)
0.0046

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Late-Breaking Abstract Session: Presentation and Discussion of LBA5507

Track

Special Sessions,Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04209855

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 17; abstr LBA5507)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.17_suppl.LBA5507

Abstract #

LBA5507

Abstract Disclosures