National Cancer Institute sponsored NRG Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
Matthew A. Powell , Sakari Hietanen , Robert L. Coleman , Bradley J. Monk , Oleksandr Zub , David M. O'Malley , Lucy Gilbert , Iwona Podzielinski , Roberto Angioli , Dana Meredith Chase , Dirk Bauerschlag , Destin Black , Annemarie Thijs , Sudarshan Sharma , Michael A. Gold , Kari L Ring , Zangdong He , Shadi Stevens , Brian M. Slomovitz , Mansoor R. Mirza
Background: RUBY (NCT03981796) evaluated the efficacy and safety of the anti–programmed death 1 (PD-1) dostarlimab + standard of care (SOC) carboplatin paclitaxel (CP) versus CP alone in A/R EC. The primary endpoint of PFS by investigator assessment (INV) per RECIST v1.1 was significantly longer with dostarlimab+CP than placebo (PBO)+CP in the mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H; HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.162–0.495) and overall populations (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.507–0.800). Here we present secondary efficacy endpoints by BICR. Methods: RUBY is a phase 3, global, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, PBO-controlled study. Patients (pts) with primary advanced stage III or IV or first recurrent EC were randomized 1:1 to receive dostarlimab 500 mg, or PBO, plus carboplatin AUC 5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 Q3W (6 cycles), followed by dostarlimab 1000 mg, or PBO, monotherapy Q6W for up to 3 y. Secondary endpoints by BICR assessment per RECIST v1.1 were PFS, ORR, DOR, and DCR in the overall and dMMR/MSI-H populations. Results: 494 pts were randomized (245:dostarlimab+CP; 249:PBO+CP); 47.8% had recurrent disease, 18.6% and 33.6% had primary stage III and IV disease, respectively. PFS by BICR was longer with dostarlimab+CP than PBO+CP in the dMMR/MSI-H (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.158–0.543) and overall populations (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.517–0.853; Table). Consistent benefits were seen with dostarlimab+CP for ORR, DCR, and DOR by BICR in the dMMR/MSI-H and overall populations (Table). Safety was previously reported. Conclusions: Dostarlimab+CP showed clinically meaningful improvement in BICR-assessed PFS in the dMMR/MSI-H and overall populations compared with CP alone. The HRs for PFS per BICR and per INV were consistent, which supports the reliability of PFS by INV in EC trials. Benefits were seen in all BICR-assessed endpoints, which were consistent with INV. Dostarlimab+CP represents a new SOC for pts with primary A/R EC. Clinical trial information: NCT03981796.
dMMR/MSI-H | Overall | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dostarlimab +CP N=53 | PBO+CP N=65 | Dostarlimab +CP N=245 | PBO+CP N=249 | |
PFS by INV, HR (95% CI) | 0.28 (0.162–0.495) P<0.0001 | 0.64 (0.507–0.800) P<0.0001 | ||
PFS by BICR, HR (95% CI) | 0.29 (0.158–0.543) | 0.66 (0.517–0.853) | ||
Probability of PFS by BICR at 24 mo, % (95% CI) | 66.3 (50.8–77.9) | 26.0 (13.5–40.5) | 42.5 (35.2–49.6) | 25.4 (18.9–32.4) |
ORR by BICR, % (95% CI; n/N)a CR, % (n) PR, % (n) | 77.1 (62.7–88.0; 37/48) 22.9 (11) 54.2 (26) | 63.3 (49.9–75.4; 38/60) 13.3 (8) 50.0 (30) | 68.2 (61.6–74.2; 152/223) 20.6 (46) 47.5 (106) | 59.4 (52.7–65.8; 136/229) 14.8 (34) 44.5 (102) |
DCR, % (95% CI; n/N)a | 91.7 (80.0–97.7; 44/48) | 91.7 (81.6–97.2; 55/60) | 88.3 (83.4–92.2; 197/223) | 86.9 (81.8–91.0; 199/229) |
mDOR (95% CI), moa | NE (13.1–NE) | 6.9 (5.5–10.1) | 12.9 (8.2–NE) | 6.7 (5.7–8.3) |
aAssessed in pts with evaluable disease at baseline.
CR, complete response; PR, partial response; NE, not estimable. *no MRI done.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Mansoor Raza Mirza
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Olga Zamulko
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Meiqi Shi
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard