Background: it is reasonable to offer radiotherapy (RT) to improve outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed M1 prostate cancer with < 5 bone metastases (HORRAD) or low volume disease (STAMPEDE) (Burdett, S et al., Eur. Urol. 2019). Data from clinical randomized trials evaluating feasibility and overall benefit of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (cRP) in oligometastatic ormone sensitive patients are not available. The rationale for performing cytoreductive radical prostatectomy is to eliminate lethal clones ofcastration-resistant intraprostatic PCa, which can favor the process of metastasis (A Heidenreich et al. Current Opinion in Urology 2020), in order to improve OS and PFS and to prevent local progression and correlated events. Methods: APPROACH is an Italian multicenter study, which is enrolling ~566 pts with oligometastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer who are candidates to receive treatment with apalutamide. After 6 months from the start of treatment, patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive local treatment or not in addition to apalutamide (investigator's choice between primary radiotherapy and cytoreductive prostatectomy). Primary end point: To determine whether treatment with apalutamide plus ADT for 6 months followed by locoregional treatment with radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy has better efficacy than treatment with apalutamide plus ADT alone in terms of radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS). Secondary end points: To evaluate tumor shrinkage after locoregional approach and to evaluate short and long-term side effects after locoregional surgery or RT, time to PSA progression, time to castration resistance, cancer specific survival, overall survival and quality of life according to EPIC-26 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. Clinical trial information: NCT05649943.