X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) expression level analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as it relates to clinical and pathologic characteristics in prostate cancer.

Authors

null

Jennifer Kate Beckerman

George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC, DC

Jennifer Kate Beckerman , Claire Valburg , Ramesh Subrahmanyam , Victor Nava , Alexandra Zara Rozalen , Guoqing Diao , Shanshan Liu , Martha Antonio , Maneesh Rajiv Jain

Organizations

George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington DC, DC, Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC, Department of Pathology, Washington DC VA Medical Center, Washington, DC, George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC

Research Funding

Other
Prostate Cancer Foundation

Background: XIAP acts in both the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways as an inhibitor of cell death, protecting cells from a range of triggers. Regulation due to apoptosis resistance may represent a targetable factor for therapeutic intervention in prostate cancer. This study focuses on XIAP as a biomarker and its expression in correlation with disease aggression. Methods: Expression levels of XIAP was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), graded 1 through 3 according to signal intensity, in radical prostatectomy samples from 90 patients with prostate cancer with a range of phenotypes including: indolent (A), locally advanced (B), progressive to metastatic (C) and de novo metastatic (D). Prognostic data was collected and Fisher’s exact statistical analysis was performed. Secondary analyses included a Fisher’s exact test with a pairwise comparison between individual disease grades and Gleason scores. Results: Higher XIAP protein expression levels on IHC correlated with disease grade and with total Gleason score (p = 0.0008 and p = 0.0002 respectively) by Fisher’s exact test analysis, indicating more aggressive disease phenotypes. Secondary results looked at a pairwise Fisher’s exact analysis comparing XIAP expression levels among disease grades (A-D) and Gleason scores. XIAP expression only significantly differed between those with grade A and D as well as between individuals with grades B and D (measured by Bonferroni-adjusted p-value of 0.003 and 0.018 respectively). Statistical significance was also achieved in XIAP expression levels when comparing among Gleason scores 6 and 8 (p = 0.025), 6 and 9 (p = 0.0125), as well as 7 and 9 (p = 0.030). Conclusions: This study demonstrates a correlation between XIAP expression levels by IHC and aggressiveness of disease, demonstrating clinical significance of XIAP as a prostate cancer biomarker.

Disease grade (A-D) by XIAP score (1-3) as it relates to protein expression.

XIAP grade, N (%) 123
Disease grade
Indolent (A) 30 6 (20) 18 (60) 6 (20)
Locally advanced (B) 30 4 (13.3) 16 (53.3) 10 (33.3)
Metastatic, Progressed (C) 18 0 (0) 9 (50) 9 (50)
Metastatic, De Novo (D) 12 0 (0) 1 (8.3) 11 (91.7)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Epidemiology/Outcomes

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr e17012)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e17012

Abstract #

e17012

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Edward Christopher Dee

First Author: Aishwarya Subramanian

First Author: Joshua Mabellos

First Author: Lia DePaula Oliveira