Race and ethnicity reporting by US federal standards in high-impact phase 2/3 oncology clinical trial publications.

Authors

Kekoa Taparra

Kekoa A. Taparra

Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA

Kekoa A. Taparra , Ryan Benevente , Jonathan Shih , Megan Y. Gimmen , Paul Tominez , Kāʻeo Kekumano , Eric Pineda , Recinda Sherman , Curtiland Deville , Jeffrey M. Peppercorn , Scarlett L. Gomez , Linda D. Bosserman , Fumiko Chino , Manali I. Patel , Chirag S. Shah

Organizations

Stanford Cancer Institute, Palo Alto, CA, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, NAACCR, Springfield, IL, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Stanford University - School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, Cleveland Clinc, Cleveland, OH

Research Funding

Other
Stanford Cancer Institute – Women Cancer Center’s Innovation Award; Stanford Cancer Institute – SCI Fellowship Award; Stanford Cancer Institute - Cancer Innovation Award

Background: There are 5 races defined by the US Office of Management & Budget (OMB): White, Black, Asian, American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN), and Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander (NHPI) with Hispanic ethnicity. Despite the existing 1997 race standards, race reporting in oncology clinical trials is still dismal. Here we aim to 1) quantify cancer trial publications reporting race/ethnicity, 2) determine representation in published trials, and 3) identify geographic patterns of reporting race/ethnicity by 1st author. Methods: PubMed/Embase were queried for phase 2/3 clinical trials of the 6 most common cancers, published in 4 high-impact journals between 2012-2022, each reviewed by 2 independent reviewers. Trials were excluded for non-US 1st author and those including multiple cancers. Representation quotients (RQ) for each race were calculated by dividing the percent of clinical trial patients by the proportion of year-matched, site-specific incident cancers in the US (Cancer in North America data). RQ of 1 represents equal clinical trial representation compared to US cancer incidence. Trial characteristics were recorded. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RQ statistics were calculated using Kruskal-Wallis tests with Bonferroni Corrections (PBC) for multiple testing. Results: Of 1,149 publications assessed, 342 were included (224 JCO, 84 NEJM, 18 Lancet, and 16 JAMA) with 258,123 patients, 60% phase 3, and 45% US Northeast 1st author. By cancer site, 31% breast, 24% lung, 18% prostate, 18% kidney/bladder, 5% colorectal, and 4% endometrial publications were included. Race was reported in 245 publications (72%) varying by journal: 81% JAMA, 78% Lancet, 72% JCO, and 67% NEJM. Specific race/ethnicity were reported in 239 publications (70%) for White, 201 (59%) for Black, 185 (54%) for Asian, 62 (18%) for Hispanic, 48 (14%) for AIAN, and 29 (9%) for NHPI patients. Among publications reporting race, RQ varied after adjusting for multiple testing (PBC<.001) with median (IQR) RQ of 1.0 (0.9-1.1) for White, 0.6 (0.1-2.7) for Asian, 0.4 (0.1-0.7) for Black, 0.0 (0.0-0.0) for AIAN, and 0.00 (0.0-0.0) for NHPI patients. Stratified by cancer, RQ significantly differed by race for all cancers (PBC<.001), except colorectal (PBC=.004) and endometrial cancer (PBC>.99). NHPI was the only race with median RQ of 0.00 for all cancers. AIAN and NHPI race reporting by 1st author was observed most in CA, while Hispanic was observed most in TX. Conclusions: While 72% of phase 2/3 cancer clinical trials published in high-impact journals report race, 91% do not report NHPI race. Indigenous patients have the lowest reporting in cancer clinical trials. Our findings support a call to action to mandate consistent race/ethnicity reporting for publication. US clinical trialists and publishers should comply with mandated US OMB federal reporting guidelines in oncology publications.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Care Delivery and Regulatory Policy

Track

Care Delivery and Quality Care

Sub Track

Health and Regulatory Policy

Citation

J Clin Oncol 41, 2023 (suppl 16; abstr 1595)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.1595

Abstract #

1595

Poster Bd #

189

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Racial and ethnic representation in large B-cell lymphoma trials and real-world databases.

First Author: Javier Munoz

First Author: Elena Martinez

First Author: Ahsan Ayaz